¡¡good¡¡faith£»¡¡they¡¡did¡¡participate¡¡in¡¡the¡¡October¡¡elections¡¡to¡¡the¡¡territorial¡¡Legislature£»¡¡electing¡¡nine¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thirteen¡¡councilors¡¡and¡¡twenty¡four¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thirty¡nine¡¡representatives¡£¡¡Gross¡¡frauds¡¡had¡¡been¡¡perpetrated¡¡in¡¡two¡¡districts£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡made¡¡good¡¡his¡¡promise¡¡by¡¡rejecting¡¡the¡¡fraudulent¡¡votes¡£¡¡In¡¡one¡¡case¡¡a¡¡poll¡¡list¡¡had¡¡been¡¡made¡¡up¡¡by¡¡copying¡¡an¡¡old¡¡Cincinnati¡¡register¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡meantime£»¡¡thanks¡¡to¡¡the¡¡abstention¡¡of¡¡the¡¡free¡state¡¡people£»¡¡the¡¡pro¡slavery¡¡party¡¡had¡¡secured¡¡absolute¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitutional¡¡convention¡£¡¡Yet¡¡there¡¡was¡¡the¡¡most¡¡absolute¡¡assurance¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡in¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡the¡¡President¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡that¡¡no¡¡constitution¡¡would¡¡be¡¡sent¡¡to¡¡Congress¡¡for¡¡approval¡¡which¡¡had¡¡not¡¡received¡¡the¡¡sanction¡¡of¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡voters¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Territory¡£¡¡This¡¡was¡¡Walker's¡¡reiterated¡¡promise£»¡¡and¡¡President¡¡Buchanan¡¡had¡¡on¡¡this¡¡point¡¡been¡¡equally¡¡explicit¡£¡¡When£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡the¡¡pro¡slavery¡¡constitutional¡¡convention¡¡met¡¡at¡¡Lecompton¡¡in¡¡October£»¡¡Kansas¡¡had¡¡a¡¡free¡state¡¡Legislature¡¡duly¡¡elected¡£¡¡To¡¡make¡¡Kansas¡¡still¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡¡it¡¡was¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡get¡¡rid¡¡of¡¡that¡¡Legislature¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡through¡¡whose¡¡agency¡¡it¡¡had¡¡been¡¡chosen£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡to¡¡frame¡¡a¡¡constitution¡¡which¡¡would¡¡secure¡¡the¡¡approval¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Buchanan¡¡Administration¡£¡¡Incredible¡¡as¡¡it¡¡may¡¡seem£»¡¡all¡¡this¡¡was¡¡actually¡¡accomplished¡£¡¡John¡¡Calhoun£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡been¡¡chosen¡¡president¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Lecompton¡¡convention£»¡¡spent¡¡some¡¡time¡¡in¡¡Washington¡¡before¡¡the¡¡adjourned¡¡meeting¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention¡£¡¡He¡¡secured¡¡the¡¡aid¡¡of¡¡master¡hands¡¡at¡¡manipulation¡£¡¡Walker¡¡had¡¡already¡¡been¡¡discredited¡¡at¡¡the¡¡White¡¡House¡¡on¡¡account¡¡of¡¡his¡¡rejection¡¡of¡¡fraudulent¡¡returns¡¡at¡¡the¡¡October¡¡election¡¡of¡¡members¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Legislature¡£¡¡The¡¡convention¡¡was¡¡unwilling¡¡to¡¡take¡¡further¡¡chances¡¡on¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡that¡¡sort£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡consequently¡¡made¡¡it¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡that¡¡the¡¡president¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡should¡¡have¡¡entire¡¡charge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡election¡¡to¡¡be¡¡held¡¡for¡¡its¡¡approval¡£¡¡The¡¡free¡state¡¡legislature¡¡was¡¡disposed¡¡of¡¡by¡¡placing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡a¡¡provision¡¡that¡¡all¡¡existing¡¡laws¡¡should¡¡remain¡¡in¡¡force¡¡until¡¡the¡¡election¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Legislature¡¡provided¡¡for¡¡under¡¡the¡¡constitution¡£¡¡The¡¡master¡stroke¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡however£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡provision¡¡for¡¡submitting¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡to¡¡the¡¡vote¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡Voters¡¡were¡¡not¡¡permitted¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡or¡¡reject¡¡the¡¡instrument£»¡¡all¡¡votes¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡for¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡either¡¡¡¨with¡¡slavery¡¨¡¡or¡¡¡¨with¡¡no¡¡slavery¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡the¡¡document¡¡itself¡¡recognized¡¡slavery¡¡as¡¡already¡¡existing¡¡and¡¡declared¡¡the¡¡right¡¡of¡¡slave¡¡property¡¡like¡¡other¡¡property¡¡¡¨before¡¡and¡¡higher¡¡than¡¡any¡¡constitutional¡¡sanction¡£¡¨¡¡Other¡¡provisions¡¡made¡¡emancipation¡¡difficult¡¡by¡¡providing¡¡in¡¡any¡¡case¡¡for¡¡complete¡¡monetary¡¡remuneration¡¡and¡¡for¡¡the¡¡consent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡owners¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡numerous¡¡other¡¡provisions¡¡offensive¡¡to¡¡free¡state¡¡men¡£¡¡It¡¡had¡¡been¡¡rightly¡¡surmised¡¡that¡¡they¡¡would¡¡take¡¡no¡¡part¡¡in¡¡such¡¡an¡¡election¡¡and¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡constitution¡¡with¡¡slavery¡¨¡¡would¡¡be¡¡approved¡£¡¡The¡¡vote¡¡on¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡was¡¡set¡¡for¡¡the¡¡21st¡¡of¡¡December¡£¡¡For¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡with¡¡slavery¡¡6226¡¡votes¡¡were¡¡recorded¡¡and¡¡569¡¡for¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡without¡¡slavery¡£¡¡While¡¡these¡¡events¡¡were¡¡taking¡¡place£»¡¡Walker¡¡went¡¡to¡¡Washington¡¡to¡¡enter¡¡his¡¡protest¡¡but¡¡resigned¡¡after¡¡finding¡¡only¡¡a¡¡hostile¡¡reception¡¡by¡¡the¡¡President¡¡and¡¡his¡¡Cabinet¡£¡¡Stanton£»¡¡who¡¡was¡¡acting¡¡Governor¡¡in¡¡the¡¡absence¡¡of¡¡Walker£»¡¡then¡¡called¡¡together¡¡the¡¡free¡state¡¡Legislature£»¡¡which¡¡set¡¡January¡¡4£»¡¡1858£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡date¡¡for¡¡approving¡¡or¡¡rejecting¡¡the¡¡Lecompton¡¡Constitution¡£¡¡At¡¡this¡¡election¡¡the¡¡votes¡¡cast¡¡were¡¡138¡¡for¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡with¡¡slavery£»¡¡24¡¡for¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡without¡¡slavery£»¡¡and¡¡10£»226¡¡against¡¡the¡¡constitution¡£¡¡But¡¡President¡¡Buchanan¡¡had¡¡become¡¡thoroughly¡¡committed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Lecompton¡¡Constitution¡£¡¡Disregarding¡¡the¡¡advice¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡Governor£»¡¡he¡¡sent¡¡the¡¡Lecompton¡¡Constitution¡¡to¡¡Congress¡¡with¡¡the¡¡recommendation¡¡that¡¡Kansas¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡as¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡£¡¡Here¡¡was¡¡a¡¡crisis¡¡big¡¡with¡¡the¡¡fate¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Democratic¡¡party£»¡¡if¡¡not¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¡Stephen¡¡A¡£¡¡Douglas¡¡had¡¡already¡¡given¡¡notice¡¡that¡¡he¡¡would¡¡oppose¡¡the¡¡Lecompton¡¡Constitution¡£¡¡In¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡its¡¡rejection¡¡he¡¡made¡¡a¡¡notable¡¡speech¡¡which¡¡called¡¡forth¡¡the¡¡bitterest¡¡enmity¡¡from¡¡the¡¡South¡¡and¡¡arrayed¡¡all¡¡the¡¡forces¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Administration¡¡against¡¡him¡£¡¡Supporters¡¡of¡¡Douglas¡¡were¡¡removed¡¡from¡¡office£»¡¡and¡¡anti¡Douglas¡¡men¡¡were¡¡put¡¡in¡¡their¡¡places¡£¡¡In¡¡his¡¡fight¡¡against¡¡the¡¡fraudulent¡¡constitution¡¡Douglas¡¡himself£»¡¡however£»¡¡still¡¡had¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡Northern¡¡Democrats£»¡¡especially¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Western¡¡States£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Republicans¡¡in¡¡Congress¡£¡¡A¡¡bill¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡Kansas¡¡passed¡¡the¡¡Senate£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡the¡¡House¡¡a¡¡proviso¡¡was¡¡attached¡¡requiring¡¡that¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡should¡¡first¡¡be¡¡submitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Kansas¡¡for¡¡acceptance¡¡or¡¡rejection¡£¡¡This¡¡amendment¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡accepted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡with¡¡the¡¡modification¡¡that£»¡¡if¡¡the¡¡people¡¡voted¡¡for¡¡the¡¡constitution£»¡¡the¡¡State¡¡should¡¡have¡¡a¡¡large¡¡donation¡¡of¡¡public¡¡land£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡if¡¡they¡¡rejected¡¡it£»¡¡they¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡as¡¡a¡¡State¡¡until¡¡they¡¡had¡¡a¡¡population¡¡large¡¡enough¡¡to¡¡entitle¡¡them¡¡to¡¡a¡¡representative¡¡in¡¡the¡¡lower¡¡House¡£¡¡The¡¡vote¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡was¡¡cast¡¡on¡¡August¡¡2£»¡¡1858£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡rejected¡¡by¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡nearly¡¡twelve¡¡thousand¡£¡¡Thus¡¡resulted¡¡the¡¡last¡¡effort¡¡to¡¡impose¡¡slavery¡¡on¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Kansas¡£¡¡Although¡¡the¡¡war¡¡between¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡freedom¡¡was¡¡fought¡¡out¡¡in¡¡miniature¡¡in¡¡Kansas£»¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡issue¡¡was¡¡the¡¡preservation¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡This£»¡¡however£»¡¡involved¡¡directly¡¡the¡¡prospect¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡¡in¡¡other¡¡border¡¡States¡¡and¡¡ultimate¡¡complete¡¡emancipation¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡States¡£¡¡The¡¡issue¡¡is¡¡well¡¡stated¡¡in¡¡a¡¡Fourth¡¡of¡¡July¡¡address¡¡which¡¡Charles¡¡Robinson¡¡delivered¡¡at¡¡Lawrence£»¡¡Kansas£»¡¡in¡¡1855£»¡¡after¡¡the¡¡invasion¡¡of¡¡Missourians¡¡to¡¡influence¡¡the¡¡March¡¡election¡¡of¡¡that¡¡year£»¡¡but¡¡before¡¡the¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡bloody¡¡conflict£º¡¡¡¨What¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡given¡¡for¡¡the¡¡cowardly¡¡invasion¡¡of¡¡our¡¡rights¡¡by¡¡our¡¡neighbors£¿¡¡They¡¡say¡¡that¡¡if¡¡Kansas¡¡is¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡free¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡their¡¡own¡¡State¡¡will¡¡be¡¡in¡¡danger¡¡¡£¡£¡£¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡make¡¡it¡¡necessary£»¡¡by¡¡their¡¡unlawful¡¡course£»¡¡for¡¡us¡¡to¡¡establish¡¡freedom¡¡in¡¡that¡¡State¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡enjoy¡¡the¡¡liberty¡¡of¡¡governing¡¡ourselves¡¡in¡¡Kansas£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡that¡¡be¡¡the¡¡issue¡£¡¡If¡¡Kansas¡¡and¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡North¡¡must¡¡be¡¡enslaved£»¡¡or¡¡Missouri¡¡become¡¡free£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡her¡¡be¡¡made¡¡free¡£¡¡Aye£¡¡¡and¡¡if¡¡to¡¡be¡¡free¡¡ourselves£»¡¡slavery¡¡must¡¡be¡¡abolished¡¡in¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡country£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡us¡¡accept¡¡that¡¡due¡£¡¡If¡¡black¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡States¡¡is¡¡incompatible¡¡with¡¡white¡¡freedom¡¡in¡¡any¡¡State£»¡¡then¡¡let¡¡black¡¡slavery¡¡be¡¡abolished¡¡from¡¡all¡£¡¡As¡¡men¡¡espousing¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Declaration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Fathers£»¡¡we¡¡can¡¡do¡¡nothing¡¡else¡¡than¡¡accept¡¡these¡¡issues¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡men¡¡who¡¡saved¡¡Kansas¡¡to¡¡freedom¡¡were¡¡not¡¡abolitionists¡¡in¡¡the¡¡restricted¡¡sense¡£¡¡Governor¡¡Walker¡¡found¡¡in¡¡1857¡¡that¡¡a¡¡considerable¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡free¡state¡¡men¡¡were¡¡Democrats¡¡and¡¡that¡¡some¡¡were¡¡from¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡Nearly¡¡all¡¡actual¡¡settlers£»¡¡from¡¡whatever¡¡source¡¡they¡¡came£»¡¡were¡¡free¡state¡¡men¡¡who¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡was¡¡a¡¡burden¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡country¡¡as¡¡Kansas¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡during¡¡the¡¡first¡¡winter¡¡of¡¡the¡¡occupation¡¡of¡¡Kansas£»¡¡an¡¡owner¡¡of¡¡nineteen¡¡slaves¡¡was¡¡himself¡¡forced¡¡to¡¡work¡¡like¡¡a¡¡trooper¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡them¡¡from¡¡freezing£»¡¡and£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡them¡¡did¡¡freeze¡¡to¡¡death¡¡and¡¡another¡¡was¡¡seriously¡¡injured¡£¡¡In¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡advertising¡¡of¡¡opportunity¡¡and¡¡all¡¡the¡¡pressure¡¡brought¡¡to¡¡bear¡¡upon¡¡Southerners¡¡to¡¡settle¡¡in¡¡Kansas£»¡¡at¡¡no¡¡time¡¡did¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡slaves¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territory¡¡reach¡¡three¡¡hundred¡£¡¡The¡¡climate¡¡and¡¡the¡¡soil¡¡made¡¡for¡¡freedom£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Governors¡¡were¡¡not¡¡the¡¡only¡¡persons¡¡who¡¡were¡¡converted¡¡to¡¡free¡state¡¡principles¡¡by¡¡residence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Territory¡£
CHAPTER¡¡XIII¡£¡¡THE¡¡SUPREME¡¡COURT¡¡IN¡¡POLITICS¡¡The¡¡decision¡¡and¡¡arguments¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Dred¡¡Scott¡¡case¡¡were¡¡published¡¡on¡¡March¡¡6£»¡¡1857£»¡¡two¡¡days¡¡after¡¡the¡¡inauguration¡¡of¡¡President¡¡Buchanan¡£¡¡The¡¡decision¡¡had¡¡been¡¡agreed¡¡upon¡¡many¡¡months¡¡before£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡appeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡negro£»¡¡Dred¡¡Scott£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡decided¡¡by¡¡rulings¡¡which¡¡in¡¡no¡¡way¡¡involved¡¡the¡¡validity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡Nevertheless£»¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡judges¡¡determined¡¡to¡¡give¡¡to¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡developed¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡John¡¡C¡£¡¡Calhoun¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sanctity¡¡of¡¡law¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Taney's¡¡dictum£»¡¡those¡¡who¡¡made¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡gave¡¡to¡¡those¡¡clauses¡¡defining¡¡the¡¡power¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡over¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡an¡¡erroneous¡¡meaning¡£¡¡On¡¡numerous¡¡occasions¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡by¡¡statute¡¡excluded¡¡slavery¡¡from¡¡the¡¡public¡¡domain¡£¡¡This£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡judgment¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Chief¡¡Justice£»¡¡they¡¡had¡¡no¡¡right¡¡to¡¡do£»¡¡and¡¡such¡¡legislation¡¡was¡¡unconstitutional¡¡and¡¡void¡£¡¡Specifically¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡¡had¡¡never¡¡had¡¡any¡¡binding¡¡force¡¡as¡¡law¡£¡¡Property¡¡in¡¡slaves¡¡was¡¡as¡¡sacred¡¡as¡¡property¡¡in¡¡any¡¡other¡¡form£»¡¡and¡¡slave¡owners¡¡had¡¡equal¡¡claim¡¡with¡¡other¡¡property¡¡owners¡¡to¡¡protection¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡Neither¡¡Congress¡¡nor¡¡a¡¡territorial¡¡Legislature¡¡could¡¡infringe¡¡such¡¡equal¡¡rights¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡popular¡¡understanding£»¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡declared¡¡¡¨that¡¡the¡¡negro¡¡has¡¡no¡¡rights¡¡which¡¡the¡¡white¡¡man¡¡is¡¡bound¡¡to¡¡respect¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Taney¡¡did¡¡not¡¡use¡¡these¡¡words¡¡merely¡¡as¡¡an¡¡expression¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡or¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Court's¡¡opinion¡£¡¡He¡¡used¡¡them¡¡in¡¡a¡¡way¡¡much¡¡more¡¡contemptible¡¡and¡¡inexcusable¡¡to¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡men¡¡of¡¡strong¡¡anti¡slavery¡¡convictions¡£¡¡He¡¡put¡¡them¡¡into¡¡the¡¡mouths¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fathers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic£»¡¡who¡¡wrote¡¡the¡¡Declaration¡¡of¡¡Independence£»¡¡framed¡¡the¡¡Constitution£»¡¡organized¡¡state¡¡Governments£»¡¡and¡¡gave¡¡to¡¡negroes¡¡full¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡citizenship£»¡¡including¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡vote¡£¡¡But¡¡how¡¡explain¡¡this¡¡strange¡¡inconsistency£¿¡¡The¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡was¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡occasion¡£¡¡He¡¡insisted¡¡that¡¡in¡¡recent¡¡years¡¡there¡¡had¡¡come¡¡about¡¡a¡¡better¡¡understanding¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phraseology¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Declaration¡¡of¡¡Independence¡£¡¡The¡¡words£»¡¡¡¨All¡¡men¡¡are¡¡created¡¡equal£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡admitted£»¡¡¡¨would¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡embrace¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡human¡¡family£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡they¡¡were¡¡used¡¡in¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡instrument¡¡at¡¡this¡¡day¡¡they¡¡would¡¡be¡¡so¡¡understood¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡the¡¡writers¡¡of¡¡that¡¡instrument¡¡had¡¡not£»¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡intended¡¡to¡¡include¡¡men¡¡of¡¡the¡¡African¡¡race£»¡¡who¡¡were¡¡at¡¡that¡¡time¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡not¡¡forming¡¡any¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡Thereforestrange¡¡logic£¡these¡¡men¡¡of¡¡the¡¡revolutionary¡¡era¡¡who¡¡treated¡¡negroes¡¡actually¡¡as¡¡citizens¡¡having¡¡full¡¡equal¡¡rights¡¡did¡¡not¡¡understand¡¡the¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡their¡¡own¡¡words£»¡¡which¡¡could¡¡be¡¡comprehended¡¡only¡¡after¡¡three¡quarters¡¡of