ny with those of the West and South were actuated by similar motives。 Sumner first gained public notice by a distinguished oration against war。 Garrison went farther： he was a professional non…resistant； a root and branch opponent of both war and slavery。 John Brown was a fanatical antagonist of war until he reached the conclusion that according to the Divine Will there should be a short war of liberation in place of the continuance of slavery； which was itself in his opinion the most cruel form of war。 Slavery as a legally recognized institution disappeared with the Civil War。 The war against intemperance has made continuous progress and this problem is apparently approaching a solution。 The war against war as a recognized institution has become the one all…absorbing problem of civilization。 The war against the wrongs of women is being supplanted by efforts to harmonize the mutual privileges and duties of men and women on the basis of complete equality。 As Samuel May predicted more than seventy years ago； in the future women are certain to take a hand both in the making and in the administration of law。
CHAPTER IV。 THE TURNING…POINT The year 1831 is notable for three events in the history of the anti…slavery controversy： on the first day of January in that year William Lloyd Garrison began in Boston the publication of the Liberator； in August there occurred in Southampton； Virginia； an insurrection of slaves led by a negro； Nat Turner； in which sixty…one white persons were massacred； and in December the Virginia Legislature began its long debate on the question of slavery。 On the part of the abolitionists there was at no time any sudden break in the principles which they advocated。 Lundy did nothing but revive and continue the work of the Quakers and other non… slaveholding classes of the revolutionary period。 Birney was and continued to be a typical slaveholding abolitionist of the earlier period。 Garrison began his work as a disciple of Lundy； whom he followed in the condemnation of the African colonization scheme； though he went farther and rejected every form of colonization。 Garrison likewise repudiated every plan for gradual emancipation and proclaimed the duty of immediate and unconditional liberation of the slaves。 The first number of the Liberator contained an Address to the Public； which sounded the keynote of Garrison's career。 〃I shall contend for the immediate enfranchisement of our slave populationI will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice on this subjectI do not wish to think； or speak； or write with moderationI am in earnestI will not equivocateI will not retreat a single inch； and I WILL BE HEARD！〃 The New England Anti…Slavery Society； of which Garrison was the chief organizer； was in essential harmony with the societies which Lundy had organized in other sections。 Its first address to the public in 1833 distinctly recognized the separate States as the sole authority in the matter of emancipation within their own boundaries。 Through moral suasion； eschewing all violence and sedition； its authors proposed to secure their object。 In the spirit of civil and religious liberty and by appealing to the Declaration of Independence； the Liberty party of 1840 and 1844； by the Freesoil party of 1848； and later by the Republican party； and that nearly all of the abolitionists continued to be faithful adherents to those principles； are sufficient proof of the essential unity of the great anti…slavery movement。 The apparent lack of harmony and the real confusion in the history of the subject arose from the peculiar character of one remarkable man。 The few owners of slaves who had assumed the role of public defenders of the institution were in the habit of using violent and abusive language against anti…slavery agitators。 This appeared in the first debate on the subject during Washington's administration。 Every form of rhetorical abuse also accompanied the outbreak of mob violence against the reformers at the time of Garrison's advent into the controversy。 He was especially fitted to reply in kind。 〃I am accused；〃 said he； 〃of using hard language。 I admit the charge。 I have not been able to find a soft word to describe villainy； or to identify the perpetrator of it。〃 This was a new departure which was instantly recognized by Southern leaders。 But from the beginning to the bitter end； Garrison stands alone as preeminently the representative of this form of attack。 It was significant； also； that the Liberator was published in Boston； the literary center of the country。 There is no evidence that there was any direct connection between the publication of the Liberator and the servile insurrection which occurred during the following August。* It was； however； but natural that the South should associate the two events。 A few utterances of the paper were fitted； if not intended； to incite insurrection。 One passage reads： 〃Whenever there is a contest between the oppressed and the oppressorthe weapons being equal between the partiesGod knows that my heart must be with the oppressed； and always against the oppressor。 Therefore； whenever commenced； I cannot but wish success to all slave insurrections。〃 Again： 〃Rather than see men wearing their chains in a cowardly and servile spirit； I would； as an advocate of peace； much rather see them breaking the heads of the tyrant with their chains。〃 * Garrison himself denied any direct connection with the Nat Turner insurrection。 See 〃William Lloyd Garrison； the Story of His Life told by His Children；〃 vol。 I； p。 251。 George Thompson； an English co…laborer with Garrison； is quoted as saying in a public address in 1835 that 〃Southern slaves ought； or at least had a right； to cut the throats of their masters。〃* Such utterances are rare； and they express a passing mood not in the least characteristic of the general spirit of the abolition movement； yet the fact that such statements did emanate from such a source made it comparatively easy for extremists of the opposition to cast odium upon all abolitionists。 The only type of abolition known in South Carolina was that of the extreme Garrisonian agitators； and it furnished at least a shadow of excuse for mob violence in the North and for complete suppression of discussion in the South。 To encourage slaves to cut the throats of their masters was far from being a rhetorical figure of speech in communities where slaves were in the majority。 Santo Domingo was at the time a prosperous republic founded by former slaves who had exterminated the Caucasian residents of the island。 Negroes from Santo Domingo had fomented insurrection in South Carolina。 The Nat Turner incident was more than a suggestion of the dire possibilities of the situation。 Turner was a trusted slave； a preacher among the blacks。 He succeeded in concealing his plot for weeks。 When the massacre began； slaves not in the secret were induced to join。 A majority of the slain were women and children。 Abolitionists who had lived in slave States never indulged in flippant remarks fitted to incite insurrection。 This was reserved for the few agitators far removed from the scene of action。 * Schouler； 〃History of the United States under the Constitution；〃 vol。 V； p。 217。 Southern planters who had determined at all hazards to perpetuate the institution of slavery were peculiarly sensitive on account of what was taking place in Spanish America and in the British West Indies。 Mexico abolished slavery in 1829； and united with Colombia in encouraging Cuba to throw off the Spanish yoke； abolish slavery； and join the sisterhood of New World republics。 This led to an effective protest on the part of the United States。 Both Spain and Mexico were advised that the United States could not with safety to its own interests permit the emancipation of slaves in the island of Cuba。 But with the British Emancipation Act of 1833； Cuba became the only neighboring territory in which slavery was legal。 These acts of emancipation added zeal to the determination of the Southern planters to secure territory for the indefinite extension of slavery to the southwest。 When Lundy and Birney discovered these plans； their desire to husband and extend the direct political influence of abolitionists was greatly stimulated。 To this end they maintained a moderate and conservative attitude。 They took care that no abuse or misrepresentation should betray them into any expression which would diminish their influence with fair…minded； reasonable men。 They were convinced that a clear and complete revelation of the facts would lead a majority of the people to adopt their views。 The debate in the Virginia Legislature in the session which met three months after the Southampton massacre furnishes a demonstration that the traditional anti…slavery sentiment still persisted among the rulers of the Old Dominion。 It arose out of a petition from the Quakers of the State asking for an investigation preparatory to a gradual emancipation of the slaves。 The debate； which lasted for several weeks； was able and thorough。 No stronger utterances in condemnation of slavery were ever voiced than appear in this debate。 Different speakers made the statement that no one presumed to defend slavery on principlethat apologists for slavery existed but no defenders。 Opposition to the petition was in the main apologetic in tone。 A darker picture of the blighting effects of slavery on the industries of the country was never drawn than appears in these speeches。 Slavery was declared to be driving free laborers from the State； to have already destroyed every industry except agriculture； and to have exhausted the soil so that profitable agriculture was becoming extinct； while pine brush was encroaching upon former fruitful fields。 〃Even the wolf；〃 said one； 〃driven back long since by the approach of man； now returns； after the lapse of a hundred years； to howl over the desolations of slavery。〃 Contrasts between free labor in northern industry and that of the South were vividly portrayed。 In a speech of great power； one member referred to Kentucky and Ohio as States 〃providentially designated to exhibit in their future histories the differences which necessarily result from a country free from； and a country afflicted with the curse of slavery。〃 The debate was by no m