scratched pictures of men and animals on the surface of a reindeer horn or mammoth tusk as mementos of his prowess。 The American Indian does essentially the same thing to…day； making pictures that crudely record his successes in war and the chase。 The Northern Indian had got no farther than this when the white man discovered America； but the Aztecs of the Southwest and the Maya people of Yucatan had carried their picture… making to a much higher state of elaboration。＇3＇ They had developed systems of pictographs or hieroglyphics that would doubtless in the course of generations have been elaborated into alphabetical systems； had not the Europeans cut off the civilization of which they were the highest exponents。 What the Aztec and Maya were striving towards in the sixteenth century A。D。； various Oriental nations had attained at least five or six thousand years earlier。 In Egypt at the time of the pyramid…builders； and in Babylonia at the same epoch； the people had developed systems of writing that enabled them not merely to present a limited range of ideas pictorially； but to express in full elaboration and with finer shades of meaning all the ideas that pertain to highly cultured existence。 The man of that time made records of military achievements； recorded the transactions of every…day business life； and gave expression to his moral and spiritual aspirations in a way strangely comparable to the manner of our own time。 He had perfected highly elaborate systems of writing。
EGYPTIAN WRITING Of the two ancient systems of writing just referred to as being in vogue at the so…called dawnings of history； the more picturesque and suggestive was the hieroglyphic system of the Egyptians。 This is a curiously conglomerate system of writing； made up in part of symbols reminiscent of the crudest stages of picture…writing； in part of symbols having the phonetic value of syllables； and in part of true alphabetical letters。 In a word； the Egyptian writing represents in itself the elements of the various stages through which the art of writing has developed。＇4＇ We must conceive that new features were from time to time added to it； while the old features； curiously enough； were not given up。 Here； for example； in the midst of unintelligible lines and pot…hooks； are various pictures that are instantly recognizable as representations of hawks； lions； ibises； and the like。 It can hardly be questioned that when these pictures were first used calligraphically they were meant to represent the idea of a bird or animal。 In other words； the first stage of picture…writing did not go beyond the mere representation of an eagle by the picture of an eagle。 But this； obviously； would confine the presentation of ideas within very narrow limits。 In due course some inventive genius conceived the thought of symbolizing a picture。 To him the outline of an eagle might represent not merely an actual bird； but the thought of strength； of courage； or of swift progress。 Such a use of symbols obviously extends the range of utility of a nascent art of writing。 Then in due course some wonderful psychologistor perhaps the joint efforts of many generations of psychologistsmade the astounding discovery that the human voice； which seems to flow on in an unbroken stream of endlessly varied modulations and intonations； may really be analyzed into a comparatively limited number of component soundsinto a few hundreds of syllables。 That wonderful idea conceived； it was only a matter of time until it would occur to some other enterprising genius that by selecting an arbitrary symbol to represent each one of these elementary sounds it would be possible to make a written record of the words of human speech which could be reproducedrephonatedby some one who had never heard the words and did not know in advance what this written record contained。 This； of course； is what every child learns to do now in the primer class； but we may feel assured that such an idea never occurred to any human being until the peculiar forms of pictographic writing just referred to had been practised for many centuries。 Yet； as we have said； some genius of prehistoric Egypt conceived the idea and put it into practical execution； and the hieroglyphic writing of which the Egyptians were in full possession at the very beginning of what we term the historical period made use of this phonetic system along with the ideographic system already described。 So fond were the Egyptians of their pictorial symbols used ideographically that they clung to them persistently throughout the entire period of Egyptian history。 They used symbols as phonetic equivalents very frequently； but they never learned to depend upon them exclusively。 The scribe always interspersed his phonetic signs with some other signs intended as graphic aids。 After spelling a word out in full； he added a picture； sometimes even two or three pictures； representative of the individual thing； or at least of the type of thing to which the word belongs。 Two or three illustrations will make this clear。 Thus qeften； monkey； is spelled out in full； but the picture of a monkey is added as a determinative； second； qenu； cavalry； after being spelled； is made unequivocal by the introduction of a picture of a horse； third； temati； wings； though spelled elaborately； has pictures of wings added； and fourth； tatu； quadrupeds； after being spelled； has a picture of a quadruped； and then the picture of a hide； which is the usual determinative of a quadruped； followed by three dashes to indicate the plural number。 It must not be supposed； however； that it was a mere whim which led the Egyptians to the use of this system of determinatives。 There was sound reason back of it。 It amounted to no more than the expedient we adopt when we spell 〃to；〃 〃two；〃 or 〃too；〃 in indication of a single sound with three different meanings。 The Egyptian language abounds in words having more than one meaning； and in writing these it is obvious that some means of distinction is desirable。 The same thing occurs even more frequently in the Chinese language； which is monosyllabic。 The Chinese adopt a more clumsy expedient； supplying a different symbol for each of the meanings of a syllable； so that while the actual word…sounds of their speech are only a few hundreds in number； the characters of their written language mount high into the thousands。
BABYLONIAN WRITING While the civilization of the Nile Valley was developing this extraordinary system of hieroglyphics； the inhabitants of Babylonia were practising the art of writing along somewhat different lines。 It is certain that they began with picture…making； and that in due course they advanced to the development of the syllabary； but； unlike their Egyptian cousins； the men of Babylonia saw fit to discard the old system when they had perfected a better one。＇5＇ So at a very early day their writingas revealed to us now through the recent excavationshad ceased to have that pictorial aspect which distinguishes the Egyptian script。 What had originally been pictures of objectsfish； houses； and the likehad come to be represented by mere aggregations of wedge…shaped marks。 As the writing of the Babvlonians was chiefly inscribed on soft clay； the adaptation of this wedge…shaped mark in lieu of an ordinary line was probably a mere matter of convenience； since the sharp…cornered implement used in making the inscription naturally made a wedge…shaped impression in the clay。 That； however； is a detail。 The essential thing is that the Babylonian had so fully analyzed the speech…sounds that he felt entire confidence in them； and having selected a sufficient number of conventional characterseach made up of wedge…shaped linesto represent all the phonetic sounds of his language； spelled the words out in syllables and to some extent dispensed with the determinative signs which； as we have seen； played so prominent a part in the Egyptian writing。 His cousins the Assyrians used habitually a system of writing the foundation of which was an elaborate phonetic syllabary； a system； therefore； far removed from the old crude pictograph； and in some respects much more developed than the complicated Egyptian method； yet； after all； a system that stopped short of perfection by the wide gap that separates the syllabary from the true alphabet。 A brief analysis of speech sounds will aid us in understanding the real nature of the syllabary。 Let us take for consideration the consonantal sound represented by the letter b。 A moment's consideration will make it clear that this sound enters into a large number of syllables。 There are； for example； at least twenty vowel sounds in the English language； not to speak of certain digraphs； that is to say； each of the important vowels has from two to six sounds。 Each of these vowel sounds may enter into combination with the b sound alone to form three syllables； as ba； ab； bal； be； eb； bel； etc。 Thus there are at least sixty b…sound syllables。 But this is not the end； for other consonantal sounds may be associated in the syllables in such combinations as bad； bed； bar； bark； cab； etc。 As each of the other twenty odd consonantal sounds may enter into similar combinations； it is obvious that there are several hundreds of fundamental syllables to be taken into account in any syllabic system of writing。 For each of these syllables a symbol must be set aside and held in reserve as the representative of that particular sound。 A perfect syllabary； then； would require some hundred or more of symbols to represent b sounds alone； and since the sounds for c； d； f； and the rest are equally varied； the entire syllabary would run into thousands of characters； almost rivalling in complexity the Chinese system。 But in practice the most perfect syllabary； Such as that of the Babylonians； fell short of this degree of precision through ignoring the minor shades of sound； just as our own alphabet is content to represent some thirty vowel sounds by five letters； ignoring the fact that a； for example； has really half a dozen distinct phonetic values。 By such slurring of sounds the syllabary is reduced far below its ideal limits； yet even so it retains three or four hundred characters。 In point of fact； such a work as Professor Delitzsch's Assyrian Grammar＇6＇ presents signs