bitable globe as having the somewhat lenticular shape which a crude map of these regions suggests。 We have already had occasion to see that at an earlier day Anaxagoras was perhaps influenced in his conception of the shape of the earth by this idea； and the constant references of Strabo impress upon us the thought that this long； relatively narrow area of the earth's surface is the only one which can be conceived of as habitable。 Strabo had much to tell us concerning zones； which； following Posidonius； he believes to have been first described by Parmenides。 We may note； however； that other traditions assert that both Thales and Pythagoras had divided the earth into zones。 The number of zones accepted by Strabo is five； and he criticises Polybius for making the number six。 The five zones accepted by Strabo are as follows： the uninhabitable torrid zone lying in the region of the equator； a zone on either side of this extending to the tropic； and then the temperate zones extending in either direction from the tropic to the arctic regions。 There seems to have been a good deal of dispute among the scholars of the time as to the exact arrangement of these zones； but the general idea that the north…temperate zone is the part of the earth with which the geographer deals seemed clearly established。 That the south…temperate zone would also present a habitable area is an idea that is sometimes suggested； though seldom or never distinctly expressed。 It is probable that different opinions were held as to this； and no direct evidence being available； a cautiously scientific geographer like Strabo would naturally avoid the expression of an opinion regarding it。 Indeed； his own words leave us somewhat in doubt as to the precise character of his notion regarding the zones。 Perhaps we shall do best to quote them： 〃Let the earth be supposed to consist of five zones。 （1） The equatorial circle described around it。 （2） Another parallel to this； and defining the frigid zone of the northern hemisphere。 （3） A circle passing through the poles and cutting the two preceding circles at right… angles。 The northern hemisphere contains two quarters of the earth； which are bounded by the equator and circle passing through the poles。 Each of these quarters should be supposed to contain a four…sided district； its northern side being of one…half of the parallel next the pole； its southern by the half of the equator； and its remaining sides by two segments of the circle drawn through the poles； opposite to each other； and equal in length。 In one of these （which of them is of no consequence） the earth which we inhabit is situated； surrounded by a sea and similar to an island。 This； as we said before； is evident both to our senses and to our reason。 But let any one doubt this； it makes no difference so far as geography is concerned whether you believe the portion of the earth which we inhabit to be an island or only admit what we know from experience namely； that whether you start from the east or the west you may sail all around it。 Certain intermediate spaces may have been left （unexplored）； but these are as likely to be occupied by sea as uninhabited land。 The object of the geographer is to describe known countries。 Those which are unknown he passes over equally with those beyond the limits of the inhabited earth。 It will； therefore； be sufficient for describing the contour of the island we have been speaking of； if we join by a right line the outmost points which； up to this time； have been explored by voyagers along the coast on either side。〃＇3＇ We may pass over the specific criticisms of Strabo upon various explorations that seem to have been of great interest to his contemporaries； including an alleged trip of one Eudoxus out into the Atlantic； and the journeyings of Pytheas in the far north。 It is Pytheas； we may add； who was cited by Hipparchus as having made the mistaken observation that the length of the shadow of the gnomon is the same at Marseilles and Byzantium； hence that these two places are on the same parallel。 Modern commentators have defended Pytheas as regards this observation； claiming that it was Hipparchus and not Pytheas who made the second observation from which the faulty induction was drawn。 The point is of no great significance； however； except as showing that a correct method of determining the problems of latitude had thus early been suggested。 That faulty observations and faulty application of the correct principle should have been made is not surprising。 Neither need we concern ourselves with the details as to the geographical distances； which Strabo found so worthy of criticism and controversy。 But in leaving the great geographer we may emphasize his point of view and that of his contemporaries by quoting three fundamental principles which he reiterates as being among the 〃facts established by natural philosophers。〃 He tells us that 〃（1） The earth and heavens are spheroidal。 （2） The tendency of all bodies having weight is towards a centre。 （3） Further； the earth being spheroidal and having the same centre as the heavens； is motionless； as well as the axis that passes through both it and the heavens。 The heavens turn round both the earth and its axis； from east to west。 The fixed stars turn round with it at the same rate as the whole。 These fixed stars follow in their course parallel circles； the principal of which are the equator； two tropics； and the arctic circles； while the planets； the sun； and the moon describe certain circles comprehended within the zodiac。〃＇4＇ Here； then； is a curious mingling of truth and error。 The Pythagorean doctrine that the earth is round had become a commonplace； but it would appear that the theory of Aristarchus； according to which the earth is in motion； has been almost absolutely forgotten。 Strabo does not so much as refer to it； neither； as we shall see； is it treated with greater respect by the other writers of the period。
TWO FAMOUS EXPOSITORSPLINY AND PTOLEMY While Strabo was pursuing his geographical studies at Alexandria； a young man came to Rome who was destined to make his name more widely known in scientific annals than that of any other Latin writer of antiquity。 This man was Plinius Secundus； who； to distinguish him from his nephew； a famous writer in another field； is usually spoken of as Pliny the Elder。 There is a famous story to the effect that the great Roman historian Livy on one occasion addressed a casual associate in the amphitheatre at Rome； and on learning that the stranger hailed from the outlying Spanish province of the empire； remarked to him； 〃Yet you have doubtless heard of my writings even there。〃 〃Then；〃 replied the stranger； 〃you must be either Livy or Pliny。〃 The anecdote illustrates the wide fame which the Roman naturalist achieved in his own day。 And the records of the Middle Ages show that this popularity did not abate in succeeding times。 Indeed； the Natural History of Pliny is one of the comparatively few bulky writings of antiquity that the efforts of copyists have preserved to us almost entire。 It is； indeed； a remarkable work and eminently typical of its time； but its author was an industrious compiler； not a creative genius。 As a monument of industry it has seldom been equalled； and in this regard it seems the more remarkable inasmuch as Pliny was a practical man of affairs who occupied most of his life as a soldier fighting the battles of the empire。 He compiled his book in the leisure hours stolen from sleep； often writing by the light of the camp…fire。 Yet he cites or quotes from about four thousand works； most of which are known to us only by his references。 Doubtless Pliny added much through his own observations。 We know how keen was his desire to investigate； since he lost his life through attempting to approach the crater of Vesuvius on the occasion of that memorable eruption which buried the cities of Herculaneum and Pompeii。 Doubtless the wandering life of the soldier had given Pliny abundant opportunity for personal observation in his favorite fields of botany and zoology。 But the records of his own observations are so intermingled with knowledge drawn from books that it is difficult to distinguish the one from the other。 Nor does this greatly matter； for whether as closet…student or field…naturalist； Pliny's trait of mind is essentially that of the compiler。 He was no philosophical thinker； no generalizer； no path…maker in science。 He lived at the close of a great progressive epoch of thought； in one of those static periods when numberless observers piled up an immense mass of details which might advantageously be sorted into a kind of encyclopaedia。 Such an encyclopaedia is the so…called Natural History of Pliny。 It is a vast jumble of more or less uncritical statements regarding almost every field of contemporary knowledge。 The descriptions of animals and plants predominate； but the work as a whole would have been immensely improved had the compiler shown a more critical spirit。 As it is； he seems rather disposed to quote any interesting citation that he comes across in his omnivorous readings； shielding himself behind an equivocal 〃it is said；〃 or 〃so and so alleges。〃 A single illustration will suffice to show what manner of thing is thought worthy of repetition。 〃It is asserted；〃 he says； 〃that if the fish called a sea…star is smeared with the fox's blood and then nailed to the upper lintel of the door； or to the door itself； with a copper nail； no noxious spell will be able to obtain admittance； or； at all events； be productive of any ill effects。〃 It is easily comprehensible that a work fortified with such practical details as this should have gained wide popularity。 Doubtless the natural histories of our own day would find readier sale were they to pander to various superstitions not altogether different from that here suggested。 The man； for example； who believes that to have a black cat cross his path is a lucky omen would naturally find himself attracted by a book which took account of this and similar important details of natural history。 Perhaps； therefore； it was its inclusion of absurdities； quite as much as its legitimate value； that gave vogue to the celebrated work of Pliny。 But be that as it may； the most famous scientist of Rome must be remem