ew of these medals。 Concerning those of which I have had good means of information； I shall merely state of three of themthat whatever may have been the official reasons for their award； I had ample reasons to convince me of the following being the true causes：
First。A medal was given to A； at a peculiarly inappropriate timeBECAUSE HE HAD NOT HAD ONE BEFORE。
Second。Subsequently a medal was given to B； in order TO DESTROY THE IMPRESSION WHICH THE AWARD OF THE MEDAL TO A HAD MADE ON THE PUBLIC THE PRECEDING YEAR。
Third。A medal was given to C； 〃BECAUSE WE THINK HE HAS BEEN ILL USED。〃
I will now enter on an examination of one of their awards； which was peculiarly injudicious。 I allude to that concerning the mode of rendering platina malleable。 Respecting； as I did； the illustrious philosopher who invented the art； and who has left many other claims to the gratitude of mankind； I esteem it no disrespect to his memory to place that subject in its proper light。
An invention in science or in art； may justly be considered as possessing the rights of property in the highest degree。 The lands we inherit from our fathers； were cultivated ere they were born； and yielded produce before they were cultivated。 The products of genius are the actual creations of the individual； and； after yielding profit or honour to him； they remain the permanent endowments of the human race。 If the institutions of our country； and the opinions of society； support us fully in the absolute disposal of our fields； of which we can； by the laws of nature； be only the transitory possessors； who shall justly restrict our discretion in the disposal of those richer possessions； the products of intellectual exertion？
Two courses are open to those individuals who are thus endowed with Nature's wealth。 They may lock up in their own bosoms the mysteries they have penetrated； and by applying their knowledge to the production of some substance in demand in commerce； thus minister to the wants or comforts of their species； whilst they reap in pecuniary profit the legitimate reward of their exertions。
It is open to them； on the other hand； to disclose the secret they have torn from Nature； and by allowing mankind to participate with them； to claim at once that splendid reputation which is rarely refused to the inventors of valuable discoveries in the arts of life。
The two courses are rarely compatible； only indeed when the discoverer； having published his process； enters into equal competition with other manufacturers。
If an individual adopt the first of these courses； and retaining his secret； it perish with him； the world have no right to complain。 During his life； they profited by his knowledge； and are better off than if the philosopher had not existed。
Monopolies； under the name of patents； have been devised to assist and reward those who have chosen the line of pecuniary profit。 Honorary rewards and medals have been the feeble expressions of the sentiments of mankind towards those who have preferred the other course。 But these have been； and should always be； kept completely distinct。 ＇It is a condition with the Society of Arts； never to give a reward to any thing for which a patent has been； or is to be； taken out。＇
Let us now consider the case of platina。 A new process was discovered of rendering it malleable； and the mere circumstance of so large a quantity having been sent into the market； was a positive benefit； of no ordinary magnitude； to many of the arts。 The discoverer of this valuable process selected that course for which no reasonable man could blame him； and from some circumstance； or perhaps from accident； he preserved no written record of the manipulations。 Had Providence appointed for that disorder； which terminated too fatally； a more rapid career； all the knowledge he had acquired from the long attention he had devoted to the subject； would have been lost to mankind。 The hand of a friend recorded the directions of the expiring philosopher； whose anxiety to render useful even his unfinished speculations； proves that the previous omission was most probably accidental。
Under such circumstances it was published to the world in the Transactions of the Royal Society。 But what could induce that body to bestow on it their medal？ To talk of adding lustre to the name of Wollaston by their medal； is to talk idly。 They must have done it then as an example； as a stimulus to urge future inquiries in the career of discovery。 But did they wish discoveries to be so endangered？
The discoveries of Professor Mitscherlick； of Berlin； had long been considered； by a few members of the Society； as having strong claims on one of its honorary rewards； but difficulties had arisen； from so few members of the Council having any knowledge of discoveries which had long been familiar to Europe。 The Council were just on the point of doing justice to the merits of the Prussian philosopher； when it was suggested that its medal should be given to Dr。 Wollaston； and they immediately altered their intention； and thus enabled themselves to reserve their medal to Professor Mitscherlick for another year； at which period； for aught they knew； his discoveries might possess the additional merit of having been made prior to the limit allowed by their regulations。 That medal was； in fact； voted at a meeting； at which no one member present was at all conversant with the subjects rewarded。 I shall； however； say no more on this subject。 They erred from feeling； an error so very rare with them； that it might be pardoned even for its singularity。
I will； however； add one word to those whose censures have been unjustly dealt； to those who have reproached the philosopher for receiving pecuniary advantage from his inventions。
Amongst the many and varied contrivances for the demands of science； or the arts of life； with which we were enriched by the genius of Wollaston； was it too much to allow him to retain； during his fleeting career； one out of the multitude； to furnish that： pecuniary supply； without which； the man will want food for his body； and the philosopher be destitute of tools for his inventions？ Had he been； as； from the rank he held in science； he certainly would have been in other kingdoms； rich in the honours his country could bestow； and receiving from her a reward in some measure commensurate with his deserts；then； indeed； there might have been reason for that reproach； but I am convinced that； in such circumstances； the philosopher would have balanced； with no 〃niggard〃 hand； the claims of his country； and would have given to it； unreservedly； the produce of his powerful mind。
SECTION 9。
OF THE FAIRCHILD LECTURE。
Mr。 Fairchild left by will twenty…five pounds to the Royal Society。 This was increased by several subscriptions； and 100L。 3 per cent。 South Sea Annuities was purchased； the interest of which was to be devoted annually to pay for a sermon to be preached at St。Leonard's； Shoreditch。
Few members of the Society； perhaps； are aware； either of the bequest or of its annual payment。 I shall merely observe； that for five years； from 1800 to 1804； it was regularly given to Mr。 Ascough； and that for twenty…six years past； it has been as regularly given to the Rev。 Mr。 Ellis。
The annual amount is too trifling to stimulate to any extraordinary exertions； yet； small as it is； it might； if properly applied； be productive of much advantage to religion； and of great honour to the Society。 For this purpose； it would be desirable that it should be delivered at some church or chapel； more likely to he attended by members of the Royal Society。 Notice of it should be given at the place of worship appointed； at least a week previous to its delivery； and at the two preceding weekly meetings of the Royal Society。 The name of the gentleman nominated for that year； and the church at which the sermon is to be preached； should be stated。
With this publicity attending it； and by a judicious selection of the first two or three gentlemen appointed to deliver it； it would soon be esteemed an honour to be invited to compose such a lecture； and the Society might always find in its numerous list of members or aspirants； persons well qualified to fulfil a task as beneficial for the promotion of true religion； as it ever must be for the interest of science。 I am tempted to believe that such a course would call forth exertions of the most valuable character； as well as give additional circulation to what is already done on that subject。
The geological speculations which have been adduced； perhaps with too much haste by some； as according with the Mosaic history； and by others； as inconsistent with its truth； would； if this subject had been attentively considered； have been allowed to remain until the fullest and freest inquiry had irrevocably fixed their claim to the character of indisputable facts。 But； I will not press this subject further on my reader's attention； lest he should think I am myself delivering the lecture。 All that I could have said on this point has been so much more ably stated by one whose enlightened view of geological science has taken away some difficulties from its cultivators； and； I hope； removed a stumbling…block from many respectable individuals； that I should only weaken by adding to the argument。 ＇I allude to the critique of Dr。 Ure's Geology in the British Review； for July； 1829； an Essay； equally worthy of a philosopher and a Christian。＇
SECTION 10。
OF THE CROONIAN LECTURE。
The payment ＇Three pounds。＇ for this Lecture； like that of the preceding； is small。 It was instituted by Dr。 Croone； for an annual essay on the subject of Muscular Motion。 It is a little to be regretted； that it should have been so restricted； and perhaps its founder； had he foreseen the routine into which it has dwindled； might have endeavoured to preserve it； by affording it a wider range。
By giving it to a variety of individuals； competition might have been created； and many young anatomists have been induced to direct their attention to the favourite inquiry of the founder of the Lecture； but from causes which need not here be traced； this has not been the customone individual has monopolized it year after year； and