¡¶darwin and modern science¡·

ÏÂÔØ±¾Êé

Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©

darwin and modern science- µÚ148²¿·Ö


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡¡of¡¡progress£»¡¡combined¡¡to¡¡produce¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡an¡¡organic¡¡development£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡historian¡¡has¡¡to¡¡determine¡¡the¡¡central¡¡principle¡¡or¡¡leading¡¡character¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡illustrated¡¡by¡¡the¡¡apotheosis¡¡of¡¡democracy¡¡in¡¡Tocqueville's¡¡¡¨Democratie¡¡en¡¡Amerique¡¨£»¡¡where¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡is¡¡maintained¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡gradual¡¡and¡¡progressive¡¡development¡¡of¡¡equality¡¡is¡¡at¡¡once¡¡the¡¡past¡¡and¡¡the¡¡future¡¡of¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡men¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡The¡¡same¡¡two¡¡principles¡¡are¡¡combined¡¡in¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡Spencer¡¡£¨who¡¡held¡¡that¡¡society¡¡is¡¡an¡¡organism£»¡¡though¡¡he¡¡also¡¡contemplated¡¡its¡¡being¡¡what¡¡he¡¡calls¡¡a¡¡¡¨super¡­organic¡¡aggregate¡¨£©¡¡£¨A¡¡society¡¡presents¡¡suggestive¡¡analogies¡¡with¡¡an¡¡organism£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡certainly¡¡is¡¡not¡¡an¡¡organism£»¡¡and¡¡sociologists¡¡who¡¡draw¡¡inferences¡¡from¡¡the¡¡assumption¡¡of¡¡its¡¡organic¡¡nature¡¡must¡¡fall¡¡into¡¡error¡£¡¡¡¡A¡¡vital¡¡organism¡¡and¡¡a¡¡society¡¡are¡¡radically¡¡distinguished¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡components¡¡of¡¡the¡¡former£»¡¡namely¡¡the¡¡cells£»¡¡are¡¡morphologically¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡functionally¡¡differentiated£»¡¡whereas¡¡the¡¡individuals¡¡which¡¡compose¡¡a¡¡society¡¡are¡¡morphologically¡¡homogeneous¡¡and¡¡only¡¡functionally¡¡differentiated¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡resemblances¡¡and¡¡the¡¡differences¡¡are¡¡worked¡¡out¡¡in¡¡E¡£¡¡de¡¡Majewski's¡¡striking¡¡book¡¡¡¨La¡¡Science¡¡de¡¡la¡¡Civilisation¡¨£»¡¡Paris£»¡¡1908¡££©£»¡¡that¡¡social¡¡evolution¡¡is¡¡a¡¡progressive¡¡change¡¡from¡¡militarism¡¡to¡¡industrialism¡£

7¡£¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡development¡¡assumed¡¡another¡¡form¡¡in¡¡the¡¡speculations¡¡of¡¡German¡¡idealism¡£¡¡¡¡Hegel¡¡conceived¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡periods¡¡of¡¡history¡¡as¡¡corresponding¡¡to¡¡the¡¡ascending¡¡phases¡¡or¡¡ideas¡¡in¡¡the¡¡self¡­evolution¡¡of¡¡his¡¡Absolute¡¡Being¡£¡¡¡¡His¡¡¡¨Lectures¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Philosophy¡¡of¡¡History¡¨¡¡were¡¡published¡¡in¡¡1837¡¡after¡¡his¡¡death¡£¡¡¡¡His¡¡philosophy¡¡had¡¡a¡¡considerable¡¡effect£»¡¡direct¡¡and¡¡indirect£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡treatment¡¡of¡¡history¡¡by¡¡historians£»¡¡and¡¡although¡¡he¡¡was¡¡superficial¡¡and¡¡unscientific¡¡himself¡¡in¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡historical¡¡phenomena£»¡¡he¡¡contributed¡¡much¡¡towards¡¡making¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡historical¡¡development¡¡familiar¡£¡¡¡¡Ranke¡¡was¡¡influenced£»¡¡if¡¡not¡¡by¡¡Hegel¡¡himself£»¡¡at¡¡least¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Idealistic¡¡philosophies¡¡of¡¡which¡¡Hegel's¡¡was¡¡the¡¡greatest¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡was¡¡inclined¡¡to¡¡conceive¡¡the¡¡stages¡¡in¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡history¡¡as¡¡marked¡¡by¡¡incarnations£»¡¡as¡¡it¡¡were£»¡¡of¡¡ideas£»¡¡and¡¡sometimes¡¡speaks¡¡as¡¡if¡¡the¡¡ideas¡¡were¡¡independent¡¡forces£»¡¡with¡¡hands¡¡and¡¡feet¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡while¡¡Hegel¡¡determined¡¡his¡¡ideas¡¡by¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡logic£»¡¡Ranke¡¡obtained¡¡his¡¡by¡¡inductionby¡¡a¡¡strict¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phenomena£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was¡¡scientific¡¡in¡¡his¡¡method¡¡and¡¡work£»¡¡and¡¡was¡¡influenced¡¡by¡¡Hegelian¡¡prepossessions¡¡only¡¡in¡¡the¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡significance¡¡which¡¡he¡¡was¡¡disposed¡¡to¡¡ascribe¡¡to¡¡his¡¡results¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡noted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡Hegel¡¡implied¡¡a¡¡judgment¡¡of¡¡value£»¡¡the¡¡movement¡¡was¡¡a¡¡progress¡¡towards¡¡perfection¡£

8¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡France£»¡¡Comte¡¡approached¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡from¡¡a¡¡different¡¡side£»¡¡and¡¡exercised£»¡¡outside¡¡Germany£»¡¡a¡¡far¡¡wider¡¡influence¡¡than¡¡Hegel¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡4th¡¡volume¡¡of¡¡his¡¡¡¨Cours¡¡de¡¡philosophie¡¡positive¡¨£»¡¡which¡¡appeared¡¡in¡¡1839£»¡¡created¡¡sociology¡¡and¡¡treated¡¡history¡¡as¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡this¡¡new¡¡science£»¡¡namely¡¡as¡¡¡¨social¡¡dynamics¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡Comte¡¡sought¡¡the¡¡key¡¡for¡¡unfolding¡¡historical¡¡development£»¡¡in¡¡what¡¡he¡¡called¡¡the¡¡social¡­psychological¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡worked¡¡out¡¡the¡¡two¡¡ideas¡¡which¡¡had¡¡been¡¡enunciated¡¡by¡¡Condorcet£º¡¡¡¡that¡¡the¡¡historian's¡¡attention¡¡should¡¡be¡¡directed¡¡not£»¡¡as¡¡hitherto£»¡¡principally¡¡to¡¡eminent¡¡individuals£»¡¡but¡¡to¡¡the¡¡collective¡¡behaviour¡¡of¡¡the¡¡masses£»¡¡as¡¡being¡¡the¡¡most¡¡important¡¡element¡¡in¡¡the¡¡process£»¡¡and¡¡that£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡nature£»¡¡so¡¡in¡¡history£»¡¡there¡¡are¡¡general¡¡laws£»¡¡necessary¡¡and¡¡constant£»¡¡which¡¡condition¡¡the¡¡development¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡two¡¡points¡¡are¡¡intimately¡¡connected£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡is¡¡only¡¡when¡¡the¡¡masses¡¡are¡¡moved¡¡into¡¡the¡¡foreground¡¡that¡¡regularity£»¡¡uniformity£»¡¡and¡¡law¡¡can¡¡be¡¡conceived¡¡as¡¡applicable¡£¡¡¡¡To¡¡determine¡¡the¡¡social¡­¡¡psychological¡¡laws¡¡which¡¡have¡¡controlled¡¡the¡¡development¡¡is£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡Comte£»¡¡the¡¡task¡¡of¡¡sociologists¡¡and¡¡historians¡£

9¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡hypothesis¡¡of¡¡general¡¡laws¡¡operative¡¡in¡¡history¡¡was¡¡carried¡¡further¡¡in¡¡a¡¡book¡¡which¡¡appeared¡¡in¡¡England¡¡twenty¡¡years¡¡later¡¡and¡¡exercised¡¡an¡¡influence¡¡in¡¡Europe¡¡far¡¡beyond¡¡its¡¡intrinsic¡¡merit£»¡¡Buckle's¡¡¡¨History¡¡of¡¡Civilisation¡¡in¡¡England¡¨¡¡£¨1857¡­61£©¡£¡¡¡¡Buckle¡¡owed¡¡much¡¡to¡¡Comte£»¡¡and¡¡followed¡¡him£»¡¡or¡¡rather¡¡outdid¡¡him£»¡¡in¡¡regarding¡¡intellect¡¡as¡¡the¡¡most¡¡important¡¡factor¡¡conditioning¡¡the¡¡upward¡¡development¡¡of¡¡man£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡progress£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡him£»¡¡consisted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡victory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡intellectual¡¡over¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡laws¡£

10¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡tendency¡¡of¡¡Comte¡¡and¡¡Buckle¡¡to¡¡assimilate¡¡history¡¡to¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡by¡¡reducing¡¡it¡¡to¡¡general¡¡¡¨laws£»¡¨¡¡derived¡¡stimulus¡¡and¡¡plausibility¡¡from¡¡the¡¡vista¡¡offered¡¡by¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡statistics£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡Belgian¡¡Quetelet£»¡¡whose¡¡book¡¡¡¨Sur¡¡l'homme¡¨¡¡appeared¡¡in¡¡1835£»¡¡discerned¡¡endless¡¡possibilities¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡astonishing¡¡uniformities¡¡which¡¡statistical¡¡inquiry¡¡disclosed¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡belief¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡only¡¡a¡¡question¡¡of¡¡collecting¡¡a¡¡sufficient¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡statistical¡¡material£»¡¡to¡¡enable¡¡us¡¡to¡¡predict¡¡how¡¡a¡¡given¡¡social¡¡group¡¡will¡¡act¡¡in¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡case¡£¡¡¡¡Bourdeau£»¡¡a¡¡disciple¡¡of¡¡this¡¡school£»¡¡looks¡¡forward¡¡to¡¡the¡¡time¡¡when¡¡historical¡¡science¡¡will¡¡become¡¡entirely¡¡quantitative¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡actions¡¡of¡¡prominent¡¡individuals£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡generally¡¡considered¡¡to¡¡have¡¡altered¡¡or¡¡determined¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡things£»¡¡are¡¡obviously¡¡not¡¡amenable¡¡to¡¡statistical¡¡computation¡¡or¡¡explicable¡¡by¡¡general¡¡laws¡£¡¡¡¡Thinkers¡¡like¡¡Buckle¡¡sought¡¡to¡¡minimise¡¡their¡¡importance¡¡or¡¡explain¡¡them¡¡away¡£

11¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡indications¡¡may¡¡suffice¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡the¡¡new¡¡efforts¡¡to¡¡interpret¡¡history¡¡which¡¡marked¡¡the¡¡first¡¡half¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nineteenth¡¡century¡¡were¡¡governed¡¡by¡¡conceptions¡¡closely¡¡related¡¡to¡¡those¡¡which¡¡were¡¡current¡¡in¡¡the¡¡field¡¡of¡¡natural¡¡science¡¡and¡¡which¡¡resulted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡evolution¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡genetic¡¡principle£»¡¡progressive¡¡development£»¡¡general¡¡laws£»¡¡the¡¡significance¡¡of¡¡time£»¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡society¡¡as¡¡an¡¡organic¡¡aggregate£»¡¡the¡¡metaphysical¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡history¡¡as¡¡the¡¡self¡­evolution¡¡of¡¡spirit£»all¡¡these¡¡ideas¡¡show¡¡that¡¡historical¡¡inquiry¡¡had¡¡been¡¡advancing¡¡independently¡¡on¡¡somewhat¡¡parallel¡¡lines¡¡to¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡of¡¡nature¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡this¡¡out¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡appreciate¡¡the¡¡influence¡¡of¡¡Darwinism¡£

12¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡the¡¡dozen¡¡years¡¡which¡¡elapsed¡¡between¡¡the¡¡appearances¡¡of¡¡¡¨The¡¡Origin¡¡of¡¡Species¡¨¡¡£¨observe¡¡that¡¡the¡¡first¡¡volume¡¡of¡¡Buckle's¡¡work¡¡was¡¡published¡¡just¡¡two¡¡years¡¡before£©¡¡and¡¡of¡¡¡¨The¡¡Descent¡¡of¡¡Man¡¨¡¡£¨1871£©£»¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡of¡¡Lamarck¡¡that¡¡man¡¡is¡¡the¡¡co¡­descendant¡¡with¡¡other¡¡species¡¡of¡¡some¡¡lower¡¡extinct¡¡form¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡to¡¡have¡¡been¡¡raised¡¡to¡¡the¡¡rank¡¡of¡¡an¡¡established¡¡fact¡¡by¡¡most¡¡thinkers¡¡whose¡¡brains¡¡were¡¡not¡¡working¡¡under¡¡the¡¡constraint¡¡of¡¡theological¡¡authority¡£

One¡¡important¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡this¡¡fact¡¡£¨I¡¡am¡¡not¡¡speaking¡¡now¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Darwinian¡¡explanation£©¡¡was¡¡to¡¡assign¡¡to¡¡history¡¡a¡¡definite¡¡place¡¡in¡¡the¡¡coordinated¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and¡¡relate¡¡it¡¡more¡¡closely¡¡to¡¡other¡¡sciences¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡had¡¡indeed¡¡a¡¡defined¡¡logical¡¡place¡¡in¡¡systems¡¡such¡¡as¡¡Hegel's¡¡and¡¡Comte's£»¡¡but¡¡Darwinism¡¡certified¡¡its¡¡standing¡¡convincingly¡¡and¡¡without¡¡more¡¡ado¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡prevailing¡¡doctrine¡¡that¡¡man¡¡was¡¡created¡¡ex¡¡abrupto¡¡had¡¡placed¡¡history¡¡in¡¡an¡¡isolated¡¡position£»¡¡disconnected¡¡with¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡of¡¡nature¡£¡¡¡¡Anthropology£»¡¡which¡¡deals¡¡with¡¡the¡¡animal¡¡anthropos£»¡¡now¡¡comes¡¡into¡¡line¡¡with¡¡zoology£»¡¡and¡¡brings¡¡it¡¡into¡¡relation¡¡with¡¡history¡£¡¡¡¡£¨It¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡observed¡¡that¡¡history¡¡is¡¡£¨not¡¡only¡¡different¡¡in¡¡scope¡¡but£©¡¡not¡¡coextensive¡¡with¡¡anthropology¡¡IN¡¡TIME¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡it¡¡deals¡¡only¡¡with¡¡the¡¡development¡¡of¡¡man¡¡in¡¡societies£»¡¡whereas¡¡anthropology¡¡includes¡¡in¡¡its¡¡definition¡¡the¡¡proto¡­anthropic¡¡period¡¡when¡¡anthropos¡¡was¡¡still¡¡non¡­social£»¡¡whether¡¡he¡¡lived¡¡in¡¡herds¡¡like¡¡the¡¡chimpanzee£»¡¡or¡¡alone¡¡like¡¡the¡¡male¡¡ourang¡­outang¡£¡¡¡¡£¨It¡¡has¡¡been¡¡well¡¡shown¡¡by¡¡Majewski¡¡that¡¡congregations¡¡herds£»¡¡flocks£»¡¡packs£»¡¡etc¡£of¡¡animals¡¡are¡¡not¡¡SOCIETIES£»¡¡the¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡a¡¡society¡¡is¡¡differentiation¡¡of¡¡function¡£¡¡¡¡Bee¡¡hives£»¡¡ant¡¡hills£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡called¡¡quasi¡­societies£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡their¡¡case¡¡the¡¡classes¡¡which¡¡perform¡¡distinct¡¡functions¡¡are¡¡morphologically¡¡different¡££©¡¡¡¡Man's¡¡condition¡¡at¡¡the¡¡present¡¡day¡¡is¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡transformations£»¡¡going¡¡back¡¡to¡¡the¡¡most¡¡primitive¡¡phase¡¡of¡¡society£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡the¡¡ideal¡¡£¨unattainable£©¡¡beginning¡¡of¡¡history¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡that¡¡beginning¡¡had¡¡emerged¡¡without¡¡any¡¡breach¡¡of¡¡continuity¡¡from¡¡a¡¡development¡¡which¡¡carries¡¡us¡¡back¡¡to¡¡a¡¡quadrimane¡¡ancestor£»¡¡still¡¡further¡¡back¡¡£¨according¡¡to¡¡Darwin's¡¡conjecture£©¡¡to¡¡a¡¡marine¡¡animal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ascidian¡¡type£»¡¡and¡¡then¡¡through¡¡remoter¡¡periods¡¡to¡¡the¡¡lowest¡¡form¡¡of¡¡organism¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡essential¡¡in¡¡this¡¡theory¡¡that¡¡though¡¡links¡¡have¡¡been¡¡lost¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡break¡¡in¡¡the¡¡gradual¡¡development£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡continuous¡¡progress¡¡in¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡life£»¡¡resulting¡¡in¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡uncivilised¡¡Anthropos£»¡¡helped¡¡to¡¡reinforce£»¡¡and¡¡increase¡¡a¡¡belief¡¡in£»¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡civilised¡¡Anthropos¡¡as¡¡itself¡¡also¡¡a¡¡continuous¡¡progressive¡¡development¡£

13¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡diffusion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Darwinian¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡origin¡¡of¡¡man£»¡¡by¡¡emphasising¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡continuity¡¡and¡¡breaking¡¡down¡¡the¡¡barriers¡¡between¡¡the¡¡human¡¡and¡¡animal¡¡kingdoms£»¡¡has¡¡had¡¡an¡¡important¡¡effect¡¡in¡¡establishing¡¡the¡¡position¡¡of¡¡history¡¡among¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡which¡¡deal¡¡with¡¡telluric¡¡development¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡perspective¡¡of¡¡history¡¡is¡¡merged¡¡in¡¡a¡¡larger¡¡perspective¡¡of¡¡development¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡biology¡¡is¡¡to¡¡find¡¡the¡¡exact¡¡steps¡¡in¡¡the¡¡genealogy¡¡of¡¡man¡¡from¡¡the¡¡lowest¡¡organic¡¡form£»¡¡so¡¡the¡¡scope¡¡of¡¡history¡¡is¡¡to¡¡determine¡¡the¡¡stages¡¡in¡¡the¡¡unique¡¡causal¡¡series¡¡from¡¡the¡¡most¡¡rudimentary¡¡to¡¡the¡¡present¡¡state¡¡of¡¡human¡¡civilisation¡£

It¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡observed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡historical¡¡research¡¡implied¡¡by¡¡this¡¡conception¡¡need¡¡not¡¡be¡¡that¡¡of¡¡Comte¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡Positive¡¡Philosophy¡¡history¡¡is¡¡part¡¡of¡¡sociology£»¡¡the¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡it¡¡is¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡the¡¡sociological¡¡laws¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡view¡¡of¡¡which¡¡I¡¡have¡¡just¡¡spoken£»¡¡history¡¡is¡¡permitted¡¡to¡¡be¡¡an¡¡end¡¡in¡¡itself£»¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡genetic¡¡process¡¡is¡¡an¡¡independent¡¡interest¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡sociology£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡physical¡¡geography£»¡¡biology£»¡¡psychology£»¡¡is¡¡necessary£»¡¡the¡¡sociologist¡¡and¡¡the¡¡historian¡¡play¡¡into¡¡each¡¡other's¡¡hands£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡object¡¡of¡¡the¡¡former¡¡is¡¡to¡¡establish¡¡generalisations£»¡¡the¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡is¡¡to¡¡trace¡¡in¡¡detail¡¡a¡¡singular¡¡causal¡¡sequence¡£

14¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡success¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolutional¡¡theory¡¡helped¡¡to¡¡discredit¡¡the¡¡assumption¡¡or¡¡at¡¡least¡¡the¡¡invocation¡¡of¡¡transcendent¡¡causes¡£¡¡¡¡Philosophically¡¡of¡¡course¡¡it¡¡is¡¡compatible¡¡with¡¡theism£»¡¡but¡¡historians¡¡have¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡desi
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£ ÔÞһϠÌí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü