¡¡by¡¡one£»¡¡are¡¡dissociating¡¡into¡¡simpler¡¡parts¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡are¡¡watching¡¡the¡¡disintegration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨atoms¡¨¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chemist£»¡¡hitherto¡¡believed¡¡indestructible¡¡and¡¡eternal£»¡¡and¡¡measuring¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡long¡suspected¡¡store¡¡of¡¡internal¡¡atomic¡¡energy¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡stumbled¡¡on¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡dreamed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡alchemist£»¡¡and¡¡discovered¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡a¡¡veritable¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡matter¡£
The¡¡transmutation¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡radio¡activity¡¡was¡¡formulated¡¡by¡¡Rutherford¡¡£¨Rutherford£»¡¡¡¨Radio¡activity¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1905£»¡¡page¡¡307¡££©¡¡and¡¡Soddy¡¡in¡¡1903¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡its¡¡light£»¡¡all¡¡recent¡¡work¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡has¡¡been¡¡guided£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡stood¡¡the¡¡supreme¡¡test¡¡of¡¡a¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡and¡¡shown¡¡power¡¡to¡¡suggest¡¡new¡¡investigations¡¡and¡¡to¡¡co¡ordinate¡¡and¡¡explain¡¡them£»¡¡when¡¡carried¡¡out¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡summarised¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡which¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡theory£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡now¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡the¡¡progress¡¡which¡¡has¡¡been¡¡made¡¡in¡¡tracing¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡of¡¡radio¡active¡¡atoms¡£
Soon¡¡after¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡theory£»¡¡a¡¡striking¡¡verification¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡its¡¡consequences¡¡appeared¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡measurement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡deflection¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alpha¡rays¡¡suggested¡¡to¡¡Rutherford¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡that¡¡the¡¡stream¡¡of¡¡projectiles¡¡of¡¡which¡¡they¡¡consisted¡¡was¡¡a¡¡flight¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡£¡¡¡¡Ramsay¡¡and¡¡Soddy£»¡¡confining¡¡a¡¡minute¡¡bubble¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡in¡¡a¡¡fine¡¡glass¡¡tube£»¡¡were¡¡able¡¡to¡¡watch¡¡the¡¡development¡¡of¡¡the¡¡helium¡¡spectrum¡¡as£»¡¡day¡¡by¡¡day£»¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡decayed¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡isolating¡¡a¡¡very¡¡narrow¡¡pencil¡¡of¡¡alpha¡rays£»¡¡and¡¡watching¡¡through¡¡a¡¡microscope¡¡their¡¡impact¡¡on¡¡a¡¡fluorescent¡¡screen£»¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡lately¡¡counted¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡alpha¡projectiles£»¡¡and¡¡confirmed¡¡his¡¡original¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡their¡¡mass¡¡corresponded¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡¡and¡¡their¡¡charge¡¡to¡¡double¡¡that¡¡on¡¡a¡¡univalent¡¡atom¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Proc¡£¡¡Roy¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡A£»¡¡page¡¡141£»¡¡1908¡££©¡¡¡¡Still¡¡more¡¡recently£»¡¡he¡¡has¡¡collected¡¡the¡¡alpha¡particles¡¡shot¡¡through¡¡an¡¡extremely¡¡thin¡¡wall¡¡of¡¡glass£»¡¡and¡¡demonstrated¡¡by¡¡direct¡¡spectroscopic¡¡evidence¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡helium¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Mag¡£¡¨¡¡February¡¡1909¡££©
But¡¡the¡¡most¡¡thorough¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radio¡active¡¡pedigree¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡Rutherford's¡¡classical¡¡researches¡¡on¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡products¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡follow¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡on¡¡which¡¡his¡¡results¡¡are¡¡founded£»¡¡we¡¡must¡¡describe¡¡more¡¡fully¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡radio¡active¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡body¡¡known¡¡as¡¡uranium¡X¡¡is¡¡shown¡¡in¡¡a¡¡falling¡¡curve¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡1¡££©¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡that£»¡¡in¡¡each¡¡successive¡¡22¡¡days£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡falls¡¡to¡¡half¡¡the¡¡value¡¡it¡¡possessed¡¡at¡¡the¡¡beginning¡£
This¡¡change¡¡in¡¡a¡¡geometrical¡¡progression¡¡is¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡simple¡¡radio¡¡¡active¡¡processes£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡expressed¡¡mathematically¡¡by¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡exponential¡¡formula¡£
As¡¡we¡¡have¡¡said¡¡above£»¡¡solid¡¡bodies¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanations¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡or¡¡thorium¡¡become¡¡coated¡¡with¡¡a¡¡radio¡active¡¡deposit¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡this¡¡activity¡¡depends¡¡on¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡exposure¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡always¡¡show¡¡the¡¡usual¡¡simple¡¡type¡¡of¡¡curve¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡rod¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡for¡¡1¡¡minute¡¡decays¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡a¡¡curve¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡2£©¡¡which¡¡represents¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡as¡¡measured¡¡by¡¡the¡¡alpha¡rays¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡electroscope¡¡be¡¡screened¡¡from¡¡the¡¡alpha¡rays£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡found¡¡that¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡rod¡¡in¡¡beta¡¡¡an¡¡gamma¡rays¡¡increases¡¡for¡¡some¡¡35¡¡minutes¡¡and¡¡then¡¡diminishes¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡3¡££©¡£
These¡¡complicated¡¡relations¡¡have¡¡been¡¡explained¡¡satisfactorily¡¡and¡¡completely¡¡by¡¡Rutherford¡¡on¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡of¡¡successive¡¡changes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡active¡¡matter¡¡into¡¡one¡¡new¡¡body¡¡after¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Rutherford£»¡¡¡¨Radio¡¡¡activity¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1905£»¡¡page¡¡379¡££©¡¡¡¡The¡¡experimental¡¡curve¡¡represents¡¡the¡¡resultant¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡present¡¡at¡¡a¡¡given¡¡moment£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡disentangling¡¡the¡¡component¡¡effects¡¡consists¡¡in¡¡finding¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡curves£»¡¡which¡¡express¡¡the¡¡rise¡¡and¡¡fall¡¡of¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡each¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡produced¡¡and¡¡decays£»¡¡and£»¡¡fitted¡¡together£»¡¡give¡¡the¡¡curve¡¡of¡¡the¡¡experiments¡£
Other¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡investigation¡¡also¡¡are¡¡open¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡have¡¡enabled¡¡Rutherford¡¡to¡¡complete¡¡the¡¡life¡history¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡and¡¡its¡¡products£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡clear¡¡up¡¡doubtful¡¡points¡¡left¡¡by¡¡the¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡curves¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡the¡¡removal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡itself¡¡has¡¡been¡¡shown¡¡to¡¡consist¡¡solely¡¡of¡¡alpha¡rays¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡removal¡¡can¡¡be¡¡effected¡¡by¡¡passing¡¡air¡¡through¡¡the¡¡solution¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radium¡¡salt¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡emanation¡¡comes¡¡away£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡deposit¡¡which¡¡it¡¡leaves¡¡behind¡¡decays¡¡rapidly¡¡to¡¡a¡¡small¡¡fraction¡¡of¡¡its¡¡initial¡¡value¡£¡¡¡¡Again£»¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡active¡¡deposits¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡are¡¡more¡¡volatile¡¡than¡¡others£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡them¡¡by¡¡the¡¡agency¡¡of¡¡heat¡£
From¡¡such¡¡evidence¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡traced¡¡a¡¡long¡¡series¡¡of¡¡disintegration¡¡products¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡all¡¡but¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡which¡¡exist¡¡in¡¡much¡¡too¡¡minute¡¡quantities¡¡to¡¡be¡¡detected¡¡otherwise¡¡than¡¡by¡¡their¡¡radio¡activities¡£¡¡¡¡Moreover£»¡¡two¡¡of¡¡these¡¡products¡¡are¡¡not¡¡themselves¡¡appreciably¡¡radio¡¡¡active£»¡¡though¡¡they¡¡are¡¡born¡¡from¡¡radio¡active¡¡parents£»¡¡and¡¡give¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡radio¡active¡¡descendants¡£¡¡¡¡Their¡¡presence¡¡is¡¡inferred¡¡from¡¡such¡¡evidence¡¡as¡¡the¡¡rise¡¡of¡¡beta¡¡and¡¡gamma¡¡radio¡activity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡solid¡¡newly¡¡deposited¡¡by¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡this¡¡rise¡¡measuring¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡radio¡active¡¡offspring¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡non¡active¡¡bodies¡£¡¡¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radium¡¡products¡¡give¡¡out¡¡alpha¡rays¡¡only£»¡¡one¡¡beta¡¡¡and¡¡gamma¡rays£»¡¡while¡¡one¡¡yields¡¡all¡¡three¡¡types¡¡of¡¡radiation¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡pedigree¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radium¡¡family¡¡may¡¡be¡¡expressed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡table£»¡¡the¡¡time¡¡noted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡second¡¡column¡¡being¡¡the¡¡time¡¡required¡¡for¡¡a¡¡given¡¡quantity¡¡to¡¡be¡¡half¡¡transformed¡¡into¡¡its¡¡next¡¡derivative¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Time¡¡of¡¡half¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Radio¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Properties¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡decay¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡activity¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
Radium¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡About¡¡2600¡¡years¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Element¡¡chemically¡¡analogous¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡barium¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Emanation¡¡¡¡3¡£8¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Chemically¡¡inert¡¡gas£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡condenses¡¡at¡¡¡150¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡A¡¡¡¡¡¡3¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Behaves¡¡as¡¡a¡¡solid¡¡deposited¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡surfaces£»¡¡concentrated¡¡on¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡negative¡¡electrode¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡B¡¡¡¡¡¡21¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Soluble¡¡in¡¡strong¡¡acids£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡volatile¡¡at¡¡a¡¡white¡¡heat£»¡¡more¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡volatile¡¡than¡¡A¡¡or¡¡C¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡C¡¡¡¡¡¡28¡¡minutes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha£»¡¡beta£»¡¡Soluble¡¡in¡¡strong¡¡acids£»¡¡less¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡gamma¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡volatile¡¡than¡¡B¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡D¡¡¡¡¡¡about¡¡40¡¡years¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Soluble¡¡in¡¡strong¡¡acids£»¡¡volatile¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡below¡¡1000¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡E¡¡¡¡¡¡6¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡beta£»¡¡gamma¡¡¡¡Non¡volatile¡¡at¡¡1000¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡rays¡¡¡·¡¡Radium¡F¡¡¡¡¡¡143¡¡days¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡alpha¡¡rays¡¡¡¡¡¡Volatile¡¡at¡¡1000¡¡deg¡¡C¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Deposited¡¡from¡¡solution¡¡on¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡bismuth¡¡plate¡£
Of¡¡these¡¡products£»¡¡A£»¡¡B£»¡¡and¡¡C¡¡constitute¡¡that¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡active¡¡deposit¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡which¡¡suffers¡¡rapid¡¡decay¡¡and¡¡nearly¡¡disappears¡¡in¡¡a¡¡few¡¡hours¡£¡¡¡¡Radium¡D£»¡¡continually¡¡producing¡¡its¡¡short¡lived¡¡descendants¡¡E¡¡and¡¡F£»¡¡remains¡¡for¡¡years¡¡on¡¡surfaces¡¡once¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡and¡¡makes¡¡delicate¡¡radio¡active¡¡researches¡¡impossible¡¡in¡¡laboratories¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡contaminated¡¡by¡¡an¡¡escape¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡£
A¡¡somewhat¡¡similar¡¡pedigree¡¡has¡¡been¡¡made¡¡out¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡thorium¡£¡¡¡¡Here¡¡thorium¡X¡¡is¡¡interposed¡¡between¡¡thorium¡¡and¡¡its¡¡short¡lived¡¡emanation£»¡¡which¡¡decays¡¡to¡¡half¡¡its¡¡initial¡¡quantity¡¡in¡¡54¡¡seconds¡£¡¡¡¡Two¡¡active¡¡deposits£»¡¡thorium¡¡A¡¡and¡¡B£»¡¡arise¡¡successively¡¡from¡¡the¡¡emanation¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡uranium£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡the¡¡one¡¡obvious¡¡derivative¡¡uranium¡X£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡question¡¡remains¡¡whether¡¡this¡¡one¡¡descent¡¡can¡¡be¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡any¡¡other¡¡individual¡¡or¡¡family¡£¡¡¡¡Uranium¡¡is¡¡long¡lived£»¡¡and¡¡emits¡¡only¡¡alpha¡rays¡£¡¡¡¡Uranium¡X¡¡decays¡¡to¡¡half¡¡value¡¡in¡¡22¡¡days£»¡¡giving¡¡out¡¡beta¡¡¡and¡¡gamma¡rays¡£¡¡¡¡Since¡¡our¡¡evidence¡¡goes¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡radio¡activity¡¡is¡¡generally¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡production¡¡of¡¡new¡¡elements£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡natural¡¡to¡¡search¡¡for¡¡the¡¡substance¡¡of¡¡uranium¡X¡¡in¡¡other¡¡forms£»¡¡and¡¡perhaps¡¡under¡¡other¡¡names£»¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡to¡¡surrender¡¡immediately¡¡our¡¡belief¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conservation¡¡of¡¡matter¡£
With¡¡this¡¡idea¡¡in¡¡mind¡¡we¡¡see¡¡at¡¡once¡¡the¡¡significance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals¡£¡¡¡¡Formed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡remote¡¡antiquity¡¡of¡¡past¡¡geological¡¡ages£»¡¡these¡¡minerals¡¡must¡¡become¡¡store¡houses¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡products¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡except¡¡those¡¡which¡¡may¡¡have¡¡escaped¡¡as¡¡gases¡¡or¡¡possibly¡¡liquids¡£¡¡¡¡Even¡¡gases¡¡may¡¡be¡¡expected¡¡to¡¡some¡¡extent¡¡to¡¡be¡¡retained¡¡by¡¡occlusion¡£¡¡¡¡Among¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals£»¡¡then£»¡¡we¡¡may¡¡look¡¡for¡¡the¡¡descendants¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parent¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡descendants¡¡are¡¡permanent¡¡or¡¡more¡¡long¡lived¡¡than¡¡uranium£»¡¡they¡¡will¡¡accumulate¡¡continually¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡they¡¡are¡¡short¡lived£»¡¡they¡¡will¡¡accumulate¡¡at¡¡a¡¡steady¡¡rate¡¡till¡¡enough¡¡is¡¡formed¡¡for¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡disintegrating¡¡to¡¡be¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡developed¡£¡¡¡¡A¡¡state¡¡of¡¡mobile¡¡equilibrium¡¡will¡¡then¡¡be¡¡reached£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡the¡¡product¡¡will¡¡remain¡¡constant¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡constant¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡will¡¡depend¡¡only¡¡on¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡which¡¡is¡¡its¡¡source£»¡¡and£»¡¡for¡¡different¡¡minerals£»¡¡if¡¡all¡¡the¡¡product¡¡is¡¡retained£»¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡product¡¡will¡¡be¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡of¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡analyses¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡we¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡¡able¡¡to¡¡pick¡¡out¡¡its¡¡more¡¡short¡lived¡¡descendants¡¡by¡¡seeking¡¡for¡¡instances¡¡of¡¡such¡¡proportionality¡£
Now¡¡radium¡¡itself¡¡is¡¡a¡¡constituent¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡minerals£»¡¡and¡¡two¡¡series¡¡of¡¡experiments¡¡by¡¡R¡£J¡£¡¡Strutt¡¡and¡¡B¡£B¡£¡¡Boltwood¡¡have¡¡shown¡¡that¡¡the¡¡content¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡as¡¡measured¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radio¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡is¡¡directly¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡content¡¡of¡¡uranium¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Strutt£»¡¡¡¨Proc¡£¡¡Roy¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡A£»¡¡February¡¡1905£»¡¡Boltwood£»¡¡¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Mag¡£¡¨¡¡April£»¡¡1905¡££©¡¡¡¡In¡¡Boltwood's¡¡investigation£»¡¡some¡¡twenty¡¡minerals£»¡¡with¡¡amounts¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡varying¡¡from¡¡that¡¡in¡¡a¡¡specimen¡¡of¡¡uraninite¡¡with¡¡74¡£65¡¡per¡¡cent¡££»¡¡to¡¡that¡¡in¡¡a¡¡monazite¡¡with¡¡0¡£30¡¡per¡¡cent¡££»¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡ratio¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡to¡¡radium£»¡¡constant¡¡within¡¡about¡¡one¡¡part¡¡in¡¡ten¡£
The¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡irresistible¡¡that¡¡radium¡¡is¡¡a¡¡descendant¡¡of¡¡uranium£»¡¡though¡¡whether¡¡uranium¡¡is¡¡its¡¡parent¡¡or¡¡a¡¡more¡¡remote¡¡ancestor¡¡requires¡¡further¡¡investigation¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radio¡active¡¡genealogist¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡hypot