¡¶darwin and modern science¡·

ÏÂÔØ±¾Êé

Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©

darwin and modern science- µÚ59²¿·Ö


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
vely¡¡primitive£»¡¡as¡¡shown¡¡most¡¡strikingly¡¡in¡¡its¡¡cryptogamic¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡fertilisation£»¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡spermatozoids£»¡¡which¡¡it¡¡shares¡¡with¡¡the¡¡maidenhair¡¡tree¡¡alone£»¡¡among¡¡recent¡¡seed¡­plants¡£

In¡¡all¡¡the¡¡older¡¡Mesozoic¡¡rocks£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Trias¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Lower¡¡Cretaceous£»¡¡plants¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Cycad¡¡class¡¡£¨Cycadophyta£»¡¡to¡¡use¡¡Nathorst's¡¡comprehensive¡¡name£©¡¡are¡¡extraordinarily¡¡abundant¡¡in¡¡all¡¡parts¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡they¡¡were¡¡almost¡¡as¡¡prominent¡¡in¡¡the¡¡flora¡¡of¡¡those¡¡ages¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Dicotyledons¡¡are¡¡in¡¡that¡¡of¡¡our¡¡own¡¡day¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡habit¡¡and¡¡to¡¡a¡¡great¡¡extent¡¡in¡¡anatomy£»¡¡the¡¡Mesozoic¡¡Cycadophyta¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡much¡¡resemble¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡Cycadaceae¡£¡¡But£»¡¡strange¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡only¡¡in¡¡the¡¡rarest¡¡cases¡¡that¡¡the¡¡fructification¡¡has¡¡proved¡¡to¡¡be¡¡of¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡type¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡family£»¡¡the¡¡vast¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡abundant¡¡fertile¡¡specimens¡¡yielded¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Mesozoic¡¡rocks¡¡possess¡¡a¡¡type¡¡of¡¡reproductive¡¡apparatus¡¡far¡¡more¡¡elaborate¡¡than¡¡anything¡¡known¡¡in¡¡Cycadaceae¡¡or¡¡other¡¡Gymnosperms¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡predominant¡¡Mesozoic¡¡family£»¡¡characterised¡¡by¡¡this¡¡advanced¡¡reproductive¡¡organisation£»¡¡is¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Bennettiteae£»¡¡in¡¡habit¡¡these¡¡plants¡¡resembled¡¡the¡¡more¡¡stunted¡¡Cycads¡¡of¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡flora£»¡¡but¡¡differed¡¡from¡¡them¡¡in¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡numerous¡¡lateral¡¡fructifications£»¡¡like¡¡large¡¡buds£»¡¡borne¡¡on¡¡the¡¡stem¡¡among¡¡the¡¡crowded¡¡bases¡¡of¡¡the¡¡leaves¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡organisation¡¡of¡¡these¡¡fructifications¡¡was¡¡first¡¡worked¡¡out¡¡on¡¡European¡¡specimens¡¡by¡¡Carruthers£»¡¡Solms¡­Laubach£»¡¡Lignier¡¡and¡¡others£»¡¡but¡¡these¡¡observers¡¡had¡¡only¡¡more¡¡or¡¡less¡¡ripe¡¡fruits¡¡to¡¡deal¡¡with£»¡¡the¡¡complete¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡flower¡¡has¡¡only¡¡been¡¡elucidated¡¡within¡¡the¡¡last¡¡few¡¡years¡¡by¡¡the¡¡researches¡¡of¡¡Wieland¡¡on¡¡the¡¡magnificent¡¡American¡¡material£»¡¡derived¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Upper¡¡Jurassic¡¡and¡¡Lower¡¡Cretaceous¡¡beds¡¡of¡¡Maryland£»¡¡Dakota¡¡and¡¡Wyoming¡£¡¡¡¡£¨G¡£R¡£¡¡Wieland£»¡¡¡¨American¡¡Fossil¡¡Cycads¡¨£»¡¡Carnegie¡¡Institution£»¡¡Washington£»¡¡1906¡££©¡¡¡¡The¡¡word¡¡¡¨flower¡¨¡¡is¡¡used¡¡deliberately£»¡¡for¡¡reasons¡¡which¡¡will¡¡be¡¡apparent¡¡from¡¡the¡¡following¡¡brief¡¡description£»¡¡based¡¡on¡¡Wieland's¡¡observations¡£

The¡¡fructification¡¡is¡¡attached¡¡to¡¡the¡¡stem¡¡by¡¡a¡¡thick¡¡stalk£»¡¡which£»¡¡in¡¡its¡¡upper¡¡part£»¡¡bears¡¡a¡¡large¡¡number¡¡of¡¡spirally¡¡arranged¡¡bracts£»¡¡forming¡¡collectively¡¡a¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡perianth¡¡and¡¡completely¡¡enclosing¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡organs¡¡of¡¡reproduction¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡latter¡¡consist¡¡of¡¡a¡¡whorl¡¡of¡¡stamens£»¡¡of¡¡extremely¡¡elaborate¡¡structure£»¡¡surrounding¡¡a¡¡central¡¡cone¡¡or¡¡receptacle¡¡bearing¡¡numerous¡¡ovules¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡stamens¡¡resemble¡¡the¡¡fertile¡¡fronds¡¡of¡¡a¡¡fern£»¡¡they¡¡are¡¡of¡¡a¡¡compound£»¡¡pinnate¡¡form£»¡¡and¡¡bear¡¡very¡¡large¡¡numbers¡¡of¡¡pollen¡­sacs£»¡¡each¡¡of¡¡which¡¡is¡¡itself¡¡a¡¡compound¡¡structure¡¡consisting¡¡of¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡compartments¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡pollen¡¡was¡¡formed¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡their¡¡lower¡¡part¡¡the¡¡stamens¡¡are¡¡fused¡¡together¡¡by¡¡their¡¡stalks£»¡¡like¡¡the¡¡¡¨monadelphous¡¨¡¡stamens¡¡of¡¡a¡¡mallow¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡numerous¡¡ovules¡¡borne¡¡on¡¡the¡¡central¡¡receptacle¡¡are¡¡stalked£»¡¡and¡¡are¡¡intermixed¡¡with¡¡sterile¡¡scales£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡are¡¡expanded¡¡at¡¡their¡¡outer¡¡ends£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡united¡¡to¡¡form¡¡a¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡pericarp¡¡or¡¡ovary¡­wall£»¡¡only¡¡interrupted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡protruding¡¡micropyles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ovules¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡an¡¡approach¡¡to¡¡the¡¡closed¡¡pistil¡¡of¡¡an¡¡Angiosperm£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡evident¡¡that¡¡the¡¡ovules¡¡received¡¡the¡¡pollen¡¡directly¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡whole¡¡fructification¡¡is¡¡of¡¡large¡¡size£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡Cycadeoidea¡¡dacotensis£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡species¡¡investigated¡¡by¡¡Wieland£»¡¡the¡¡total¡¡length£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡bud¡¡condition£»¡¡is¡¡about¡¡12¡¡cm¡££»¡¡half¡¡of¡¡which¡¡belongs¡¡to¡¡the¡¡peduncle¡£

The¡¡general¡¡arrangement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡organs¡¡is¡¡manifestly¡¡the¡¡same¡¡as¡¡in¡¡a¡¡typical¡¡Angiospermous¡¡flower£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡central¡¡pistil£»¡¡a¡¡surrounding¡¡whorl¡¡of¡¡stamens¡¡and¡¡an¡¡enveloping¡¡perianth£»¡¡there¡¡is£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡some¡¡approach¡¡to¡¡the¡¡closed¡¡ovary¡¡of¡¡an¡¡Angiosperm£»¡¡another¡¡point£»¡¡first¡¡discovered¡¡nearly¡¡20¡¡years¡¡ago¡¡by¡¡Solms¡­Laubach¡¡in¡¡his¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡British¡¡species£»¡¡is¡¡that¡¡the¡¡seed¡¡was¡¡practically¡¡¡¨exalbuminous£»¡¨¡¡its¡¡cavity¡¡being¡¡filled¡¡by¡¡the¡¡large£»¡¡dicotyledonous¡¡embryo£»¡¡whereas¡¡in¡¡all¡¡known¡¡Gymnosperms¡¡a¡¡large¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sac¡¡is¡¡occupied¡¡by¡¡a¡¡nutritive¡¡tissue£»¡¡the¡¡prothallus¡¡or¡¡endosperm£»¡¡here¡¡also¡¡we¡¡have¡¡a¡¡condition¡¡only¡¡met¡¡with¡¡elsewhere¡¡among¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡Flowering¡¡Plants¡£

Taking¡¡all¡¡the¡¡characters¡¡into¡¡account£»¡¡the¡¡indications¡¡of¡¡affinity¡¡between¡¡the¡¡Mesozoic¡¡Cycadophyta¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms¡¡appear¡¡extremely¡¡significant£»¡¡as¡¡was¡¡recognised¡¡by¡¡Wieland¡¡when¡¡he¡¡first¡¡discovered¡¡the¡¡hermaphrodite¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Bennettitean¡¡flower¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Angiosperm¡¡with¡¡which¡¡he¡¡specially¡¡compared¡¡the¡¡fossil¡¡type¡¡was¡¡the¡¡Tulip¡¡tree¡¡£¨Liriodendron£©¡¡and¡¡certainly¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡remarkable¡¡analogy¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Magnoliaceous¡¡flowers£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡those¡¡of¡¡related¡¡orders¡¡such¡¡as¡¡Ranunculaceae¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Water¡­lilies¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡cannot£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡be¡¡maintained¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Bennettiteae£»¡¡or¡¡any¡¡other¡¡Mesozoic¡¡Cycadophyta¡¡at¡¡present¡¡known£»¡¡were¡¡on¡¡the¡¡direct¡¡line¡¡of¡¡descent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms£»¡¡for¡¡there¡¡are¡¡some¡¡important¡¡points¡¡of¡¡difference£»¡¡as£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡great¡¡complexity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stamens£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡ovary¡­wall¡¡or¡¡pericarp¡¡was¡¡not¡¡formed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡carpels¡¡themselves£»¡¡but¡¡by¡¡the¡¡accompanying¡¡sterile¡¡scale¡­leaves¡£¡¡¡¡Botanists£»¡¡since¡¡the¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡bisexual¡¡flowers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Bennettiteae£»¡¡have¡¡expressed¡¡different¡¡views¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡nearness¡¡of¡¡their¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡Flowering¡¡Plants£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡points¡¡of¡¡agreement¡¡are¡¡so¡¡many¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡resist¡¡the¡¡conviction¡¡that¡¡a¡¡real¡¡relation¡¡exists£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡ancestry¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms£»¡¡so¡¡long¡¡shrouded¡¡in¡¡complete¡¡obscurity£»¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡sought¡¡among¡¡the¡¡great¡¡plexus¡¡of¡¡Cycad¡­like¡¡plants¡¡which¡¡dominated¡¡the¡¡flora¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡in¡¡Mesozoic¡¡times¡£¡¡¡¡£¨On¡¡this¡¡subject¡¡see£»¡¡in¡¡addition¡¡to¡¡Wieland's¡¡great¡¡work¡¡above¡¡cited£»¡¡F¡£W¡£¡¡Oliver£»¡¡¡¨Pteridosperms¡¡and¡¡Angiosperms¡¨£»¡¡¡¨New¡¡Phytologist¡¨£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡V¡£¡¡1906£»¡¡D¡£H¡£¡¡Scott£»¡¡¡¨The¡¡Flowering¡¡Plants¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Mesozoic¡¡Age¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Light¡¡of¡¡Recent¡¡Discoveries¡¨£»¡¡¡¨Journal¡¡R¡£¡¡Microscop¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡1907£»¡¡and¡¡especially¡¡E¡£A¡£N¡£¡¡Arber¡¡and¡¡J¡£¡¡Parkin£»¡¡¡¨On¡¡the¡¡Origin¡¡of¡¡Angiosperms¡¨£»¡¡¡¨Journal¡¡Linn¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡£¨Bot¡££©¡¡Vol¡£¡¡XXXVIII¡£¡¡page¡¡29£»¡¡1907¡££©

The¡¡great¡¡complexity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Bennettitean¡¡flower£»¡¡the¡¡earliest¡¡known¡¡fructification¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡word¡¡¡¨flower¡¨¡¡can¡¡be¡¡applied¡¡without¡¡forcing¡¡the¡¡sense£»¡¡renders¡¡it¡¡probable£»¡¡as¡¡Wieland¡¡and¡¡others¡¡have¡¡pointed¡¡out£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡flower¡¡in¡¡Angiosperms¡¡has¡¡consisted¡¡essentially¡¡in¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡reduction£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡simplest¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡flower¡¡are¡¡not¡¡to¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡the¡¡most¡¡primitive¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡older¡¡morphologists¡¡generally¡¡took¡¡the¡¡view¡¡that¡¡such¡¡simple¡¡flowers¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡explained¡¡as¡¡reductions¡¡from¡¡a¡¡more¡¡perfect¡¡type£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡opinion£»¡¡though¡¡abandoned¡¡by¡¡many¡¡later¡¡writers£»¡¡appears¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡be¡¡true¡¡when¡¡we¡¡consider¡¡the¡¡elaboration¡¡of¡¡floral¡¡structure¡¡attained¡¡among¡¡the¡¡Mesozoic¡¡Cycadophyta£»¡¡which¡¡preceded¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms¡¡in¡¡evolution¡£

If£»¡¡as¡¡now¡¡seems¡¡probable£»¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms¡¡were¡¡derived¡¡from¡¡ancestors¡¡allied¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Cycads£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡naturally¡¡follow¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Dicotyledons¡¡were¡¡first¡¡evolved£»¡¡for¡¡their¡¡structure¡¡has¡¡most¡¡in¡¡common¡¡with¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Cycadophyta¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡should¡¡then¡¡have¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡the¡¡Monocotyledons¡¡as¡¡a¡¡side¡­¡¡line£»¡¡diverging¡¡probably¡¡at¡¡a¡¡very¡¡early¡¡stage¡¡from¡¡the¡¡main¡¡dicotyledonous¡¡stock£»¡¡a¡¡view¡¡which¡¡many¡¡botanists¡¡have¡¡maintained£»¡¡of¡¡late£»¡¡on¡¡other¡¡grounds¡£¡¡¡¡£¨See¡¡especially¡¡Ethel¡¡Sargant£»¡¡¡¨The¡¡Reconstruction¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Race¡¡of¡¡Primitive¡¡Angiosperms¡¨£»¡¡¡¨Annals¡¡of¡¡Botany¡¨£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡XXII¡£¡¡page¡¡121£»¡¡1908¡££©¡¡¡¡So¡¡far£»¡¡however£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡palaeontological¡¡record¡¡shows£»¡¡the¡¡Monocotyledons¡¡were¡¡little¡¡if¡¡at¡¡all¡¡later¡¡in¡¡their¡¡appearance¡¡than¡¡the¡¡Dicotyledons£»¡¡though¡¡always¡¡subordinate¡¡in¡¡numbers¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡typical¡¡and¡¡beautifully¡¡preserved¡¡Palm¡­¡¡wood¡¡from¡¡Cretaceous¡¡rocks¡¡is¡¡striking¡¡evidence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡a¡¡characteristic¡¡monocotyledonous¡¡family¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡must¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡Monocotyledons¡¡remains¡¡to¡¡be¡¡solved¡£

Accepting£»¡¡provisionally£»¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cycadophytic¡¡origin¡¡of¡¡Angiosperms£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡interesting¡¡to¡¡see¡¡to¡¡what¡¡further¡¡conclusions¡¡we¡¡are¡¡led¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Bennettiteae£»¡¡at¡¡any¡¡rate£»¡¡were¡¡still¡¡at¡¡the¡¡gymnospermous¡¡level¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡their¡¡pollination£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡exposed¡¡micropyles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ovules¡¡were¡¡in¡¡a¡¡position¡¡to¡¡receive¡¡the¡¡pollen¡¡directly£»¡¡without¡¡the¡¡intervention¡¡of¡¡a¡¡stigma¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡indicated¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms¡¡sprang¡¡from¡¡a¡¡gymnospermous¡¡source£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡two¡¡great¡¡phyla¡¡of¡¡Seed¡­plants¡¡have¡¡not¡¡been¡¡distinct¡¡from¡¡the¡¡first£»¡¡though¡¡no¡¡doubt¡¡the¡¡great¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡known¡¡Gymnosperms£»¡¡especially¡¡the¡¡Coniferae£»¡¡represent¡¡branch¡­lines¡¡of¡¡their¡¡own¡£

The¡¡stamens¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Bennettiteae¡¡are¡¡arranged¡¡precisely¡¡as¡¡in¡¡an¡¡angiospermous¡¡flower£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡form¡¡and¡¡structure¡¡they¡¡are¡¡like¡¡the¡¡fertile¡¡fronds¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Fern£»¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡the¡¡compound¡¡pollen¡­sacs£»¡¡or¡¡synangia¡¡as¡¡they¡¡are¡¡technically¡¡called£»¡¡almost¡¡exactly¡¡agree¡¡with¡¡the¡¡spore¡­sacs¡¡of¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡family¡¡of¡¡Fernsthe¡¡Marattiaceae£»¡¡a¡¡limited¡¡group£»¡¡now¡¡mainly¡¡tropical£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡probably¡¡more¡¡prominent¡¡in¡¡the¡¡later¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡times¡¡than¡¡at¡¡present¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡scaly¡¡hairs£»¡¡or¡¡ramenta£»¡¡which¡¡clothe¡¡every¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡plant£»¡¡are¡¡also¡¡like¡¡those¡¡of¡¡Ferns¡£

It¡¡is¡¡not¡¡likely¡¡that¡¡the¡¡characters¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡Bennettiteae¡¡resemble¡¡the¡¡Ferns¡¡came¡¡to¡¡them¡¡directly¡¡from¡¡ancestors¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡that¡¡class£»¡¡an¡¡extensive¡¡group¡¡of¡¡Seed¡­plants£»¡¡the¡¡Pteridospermeae£»¡¡existed¡¡in¡¡Palaeozoic¡¡times¡¡and¡¡bear¡¡evident¡¡marks¡¡of¡¡affinity¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Fern¡¡phylum¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡fern¡­¡¡like¡¡characters¡¡so¡¡remarkably¡¡persistent¡¡in¡¡the¡¡highly¡¡organised¡¡Cycadophyta¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Mesozoic¡¡were¡¡in¡¡all¡¡likelihood¡¡derived¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Pteridosperms£»¡¡plants¡¡which¡¡show¡¡an¡¡unmistakable¡¡approach¡¡to¡¡the¡¡cycadophytic¡¡type¡£

The¡¡family¡¡Bennettiteae¡¡thus¡¡presents¡¡an¡¡extraordinary¡¡association¡¡of¡¡characters£»¡¡exhibiting£»¡¡side¡¡by¡¡side£»¡¡features¡¡which¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms£»¡¡the¡¡Gymnosperms¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Ferns¡£

ii¡£¡¡¡¡ORIGIN¡¡OF¡¡SEED¡­PLANTS¡£

The¡¡general¡¡relation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡gymnospermous¡¡Seed¡­plants¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Higher¡¡Cryptogamia¡¡was¡¡cleared¡¡up£»¡¡independently¡¡of¡¡fossil¡¡evidence£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡brilliant¡¡researches¡¡of¡¡Hofmeister£»¡¡dating¡¡from¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡past¡¡century¡£¡¡¡¡£¨W¡£¡¡Hofmeister£»¡¡¡¨On¡¡the¡¡Germination£»¡¡Development¡¡and¡¡Fructification¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Higher¡¡Cryptogamia¡¨£»¡¡Ray¡¡Society£»¡¡London£»¡¡1862¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡original¡¡German¡¡treatise¡¡appeared¡¡in¡¡1851¡££©¡¡¡¡He¡¡showed¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡embryo¡­sac¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Coniferae¡¡may¡¡be¡¡looked¡¡upon¡¡as¡¡a¡¡spore¡¡remaining¡¡enclosed¡¡in¡¡its¡¡sporangium£»¡¡the¡¡prothallium¡¡which¡¡it¡¡forms¡¡does¡¡not¡¡come¡¡to¡¡the¡¡light¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡£¨Ibid¡£¡¡page¡¡438¡££©¡¡¡¡He¡¡thus¡¡determined¡¡the¡¡homologies¡¡on¡¡the¡¡female¡¡side¡£¡¡¡¡Recognising£»¡¡as¡¡some¡¡previous¡¡observers¡¡had¡¡already¡¡done£»¡¡that¡¡
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£ ÔÞһϠÌí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü