sieur de Bompre。 The countess; on her side; interpleaded an appeal
against the granting of letters of administration without liability;
and did all in her power to bring back the case to the Tournelle。
The other ladies carried their appeal to the high court; pleading
that they were not parties to the lawsuit in the Tournelle。
It would serve no purpose to follow the obscure labyrinth of legal
procedure of that period; and to recite all the marches and
countermarches which legal subtlety suggested to the litigants。 At
the end of three years; on the 9th of April 1661; the countess
obtained a judgment by which the king in person
〃Assuming to his own decision the civil suit pending at the
Tournelle; as well as the appeals pled by both parties; and the
last petition of Mesdames du Lude and de Ventadour; sends back
the whole case to the three assembled chambers of the States
General; to be by them decided on its merits either jointly or
separately; as they may deem fit。〃
The countess thus returned to her first battlefield。 Legal science
produced an immense quantity of manuscript; barristers and attorneys
greatly distinguishing themselves in their calling。 After an
interminable hearing; and pleadings longer and more complicated than
ever; which however did not bamboozle the court; judgment was
pronounced in Conformity with the summing up of the attorney…general;
thus
〃That passing over the petition of Mesdames Marie de la Guiche and
Eleonore de Bouille; on the grounds;〃 etc。 etc。;
〃Evidence taken;〃 etc。;
〃Appeals; judgments annulled;〃 etc。;
〃With regard to the petition of the late Claude de la Guiche and
Suzanne de Longaunay; dated 12th August 1658;〃
〃Ordered;
〃That the rule be made absolute;
〃Which being done; Bernard de la Guiche is pronounced; maintained;
and declared the lawfully born and legitimate son of Claude de la
Guiche and Suzanne de Longaunay; in possession and enjoyment of the
name and arms of the house of Guiche; and of all the goods left by
Claude de la Guiche; his father; and Marie de la Guiche and Eleonore
de Bouille are interdicted from interfering with him;
〃The petitions of Eleonore de Bouille and Marie de la Guiche; dated
4th June 1664; 4th August 1665; 6th January; l0th February; 12th
March; 15th April; and 2nd June; 1666; are dismissed with costs;
〃Declared;
〃That the defaults against la Pigoreau are confirmed; and that she;
arraigned and convicted of the offences imputed to her; is condemned
to be hung and strangled at a gallows erected in the Place de Greve
in this city; if taken and apprehended; otherwise; in effigy at a
gallows erected in the Place de Greve aforesaid; that all her
property subject to confiscation is seized and confiscated from
whomsoever may be in possession of it; on which property and other
not subject to confiscation; is levied a fine of eight hundred Paris
livres; to be paid to the King; and applied to the maintenance of
prisoners in the Conciergerie of the Palace of justice; and to the
costs。〃
Possibly a more obstinate legal contest was never waged; on both
sides; but especially by those who lost it。 The countess; who played
the part of the true mother in the Bible; had the case so much to
heart that she often told the judges; when pleading her cause; that
if her son were not recognised as such; she would marry him; and
convey all her property to him。
The young Count de la Palice became Count de Saint…Geran through the
death of his father; married; in 1667; Claude Francoise Madeleine de
Farignies; only daughter of Francois de Monfreville and of Marguerite
Jourdain de Carbone de Canisi。 He had only one daughter; born in
1688; who became a nun。 He died at the age of fifty…five years; and
thus this illustrious family became extinct。
End
小提示:按 回车 [Enter] 键 返回书目,按 ← 键 返回上一页, 按 → 键 进入下一页。
赞一下
添加书签加入书架