ve out of the definition the word Order； and to say that the best government is that which is most conducive to Progress。 For Progress includes Order； but Order does not include Progress。 Progress is a greater degree of that of which Order is a less。 Order； in any other sense； stands only for a part of the pre…requisites of good government； not for its idea and essence。 Order would find a more suitable place among the conditions of Progress； since； if we would increase our sum of good； nothing is more indispensable than to take due care of what we already have。 If we are endeavouring after more riches； our very first rule should be not to squander uselessly our existing means。 Order； thus considered； is not an additional end to be reconciled with Progress； but a part and means of Progress itself。 If a gain in one respect is purchased by a more than equivalent loss in the same or in any other； there is not Progress。 Conduciveness to Progress； thus understood； includes the whole excellence of a government。 But； though metaphysically defensible； this definition of the criterion of good government is not appropriate； because； though it contains the whole of the truth； it recalls only a part。 What is suggested by the term Progress is the idea of moving onward； whereas the meaning of it here is quite as much the prevention of falling back。 The very same social causes… the same beliefs； feelings； institutions； and practices… are as much required to prevent society from retrograding； as to produce a further advance。 Were there no improvement to be hoped for； life would not be the less an unceasing struggle against causes of deterioration； as it even now is。 Politics； as conceived by the ancients； consisted wholly in this。 The natural tendency of men and their works was to degenerate； which tendency； however； by good institutions virtuously administered； it might be possible for an indefinite length of time to counteract。 Though we no longer hold this opinion； though most men in the present age profess the contrary creed； believing that the tendency of things； on the whole； is towards improvement； we ought not to forget that there is an incessant and ever…flowing current of human affairs towards the worse； consisting of all the follies； all the vices； all the negligences； indolences； and supinenesses of mankind； which is only controlled； and kept from sweeping all before it； by the exertions which some persons constantly； and others by fits； put forth in the direction of good and worthy objects。 It gives a very insufficient idea of the importance of the strivings which take place to improve and elevate human nature and life； to suppose that their chief value consists in the amount of actual improvement realised by their means； and that the consequence of their cessation would merely be that we should remain as we are。 A very small diminution of those exertions would not only put a stop to improvement； but would turn the general tendency of things towards deterioration； which； once begun； would proceed with increasingly rapidity； and become more and more difficult to check； until it reached a state often seen in history； and in which many large portions of mankind even now grovel； when hardly anything short of superhuman power seems sufficient to turn the tide； and give a fresh commencement to the upward movement。 These reasons make the word Progress as unapt as the terms Order and Permanence to become the basis for a classification of the requisites of a form of government。 The fundamental antithesis which these words express does not lie in the things themselves； so much as in the types of human character which answer to them。 There are； we know； some minds in which caution； and others in which boldness； predominates： in some； the desire to avoid imperilling what is already possessed is a stronger sentiment than that which prompts to improve the old and acquire new advantages； while there are others who lean the contrary way； and are more eager for future than careful of present good。 The road to the ends of both is the same； but they are liable to wander from it in opposite directions。 This consideration is of importance in composing the personnel of any political body： persons of both types ought to be included in it； that the tendencies of each may be tempered； in so far as they are excessive； by a due proportion of the other。 There needs no express provision to ensure this object； provided care is taken to admit nothing inconsistent with it。 The natural and spontaneous admixture of the old and the young； of those whose position and reputation are made and those who have them still to make； will in general sufficiently answer the purpose； if only this natural balance is not disturbed by artificial regulation。
Since the distinction most commonly adopted for the classification of social exigencies does not possess the properties needful for that use； we have to seek for some other leading distinction better adapted to the purpose。 Such a distinction would seem to be indicated by the considerations to which I now proceed。 If we ask ourselves on what causes and conditions good government in all its senses； from the humblest to the most exalted； depends； we find that the principal of them； the one which transcends all others； is the qualities of the human beings composing the society over which the government is exercised。 We may take； as a first instance； the administration of justice； with the more propriety； since there is no part of public business in which the mere machinery； the rules and contrivances for conducting the details of the operation； are of such vital consequence。 Yet even these yield in importance to the qualities of the human agents employed。 Of what efficacy are rules of procedure in securing the ends of justice； if the moral condition of the people is such that the witnesses generally lie； and the judges and their subordinates take bribes？ Again； how can institutions provide a good municipal administration if there exists such indifference to the subject that those who would administer honestly and capably cannot be induced to serve； and the duties are left to those who undertake them because they have some private interest to be promoted？ Of what avail is the most broadly popular representative system if the electors do not care to choose the best member of parliament； but choose him who will spend most money to be elected？ How can a representative assembly work for good if its members can be bought； or if their excitability of temperament； uncorrected by public discipline or private self…control； makes them incapable of calm deliberation； and they resort to manual violence on the floor of the House； or shoot at one another with rifles？ How； again； can government； or any joint concern； be carried on in a tolerable manner by people so envious that； if one among them seems likely to succeed in anything； those who ought to cooperate with him form a tacit combination to make him fail？ Whenever the general disposition of the people is such that each individual regards those only of his interests which are selfish； and does not dwell on； or concern himself for； his share of the general interest； in such a state of things good government is impossible。 The influence of defects of intelligence in obstructing all the elements of good government requires no illustration。 Government consists of acts done by human beings； and if the agents； or those who choose the agents； or those to whom the agents are responsible； or the lookers…on whose opinion ought to influence and check all these； are mere masses of ignorance； stupidity； and baleful prejudice； every operation of government will go wrong； while； in proportion as the men rise above this standard； so will the government improve in quality； up to the point of excellence； attainable but nowhere attained； where the officers of government； themselves persons of superior virtue and intellect； are surrounded by the atmosphere of a virtuous and enlightened public opinion。 The first element of good government； therefore； being the virtue and intelligence of the human beings composing the community； the most important point of excellence which any form of government can possess is to promote the virtue and intelligence of the people themselves。 The first question in respect to any political institutions is； how far they tend to foster in the members of the community the various desirable qualities； moral and intellectual； or rather （following Bentham's more complete classification） moral； intellectual； and active。 The government which does this the best has every likelihood of being the best in all other respects； since it is on these qualities； so far as they exist in the people； that all possibility of goodness in the practical operations of the government depends。 We may consider； then； as one criterion of the goodness of a government； the degree in which it tends to increase the sum of good qualities in the governed； collectively and individually； since； besides that their well…being is the sole object of government； their good qualities supply the moving force which works the machinery。 This leaves； as the other constituent element of the merit of a government； the quality of the machinery itself； that is； the degree in which it is adapted to take advantage of the amount of good qualities which may at any time exist； and make them instrumental to the right purposes。 Let us again take the subject of judicature as an example and illustration。 The judicial system being given； the goodness of the administration of justice is in the compound ratio of the worth of the men composing the tribunals； and the worth of the public opinion which influences or controls them。 But all the difference between a good and a bad system of judicature lies in the contrivances adopted for bringing whatever moral and intellectual worth exists in the community to bear upon the administration of justice； and making it duly operative on the result。 The arrangements for rendering the choice of the judges such as to obtain the highest average of virtue and intelligence； the salutary forms of procedure； the publicity which allows observation and criticism of whatever is amiss； the liberty of discussion and